Kick me off here, but we have no evidence LE believes she went missing, before MD. Only a “just in case,”save your footage from 8-10. BMs work ended, before the 8th, to allow for the slab work to continue. ASSUME the general “just in case”to the 8th indicates.
Aha! Evidence she was alive, to document her in public, with or without BM on the 8th?(7th)hmmmIt is the timeline.
I believe you are using timeline to exclude BM, because there is evidence SM was alive after BM completed his dirt work, because the prep work in order to have this done occurred required several days work. I believe the px of SM, will have at least one from the two days prior to MD.
I have my own personal concrete work that has already convinced me, the search into slab was not intended to research BM.
I trust that the person interviewed wasn’t homeowner.
Therefore that person would not have capacity to tell LE to rip up concrete. AFAIK, this person is only person who “saw” BM at the site. If BM provided documentation of being in Denver, he HAS been cleared. hmmm
I posted threads ago, the homeowner (not interviewed person)wanted the building process to move forward. The homeowner pushed for slab to be cleared, not LE.
Therefore, every bit of guilt piled onto BM was faulty foundation work, pardon MY pun!
Who is the person who saw BM on site? poor memory, or mastermind?
Clear as muddy water, research while mud settles.
The simplest answer would be documentation of her being in an area, she may have crossed paths w/ someone else, other than BM. According to timeline, it’s possible BM WAS cleared early on. IMO this is a complicated case. BM is the simplest answer.