Feistyomi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2020
- Messages
- 1,034
- Reaction score
- 7,870
JMO
Thanks for providing your reasons although I politely disagree. Some of the reasons you listed though are total assumptions with no real basis. At least that we know of anyway.
We dont know if his alibi checked out or not. LE has not said one way or the other if they or he was able to prove he was in Denver.
We also dont know about the electronic evidence or even some of the home evidence as it is possible LE is still trying to get back some testing results or some more electronic research as that takes a lot of time.
I dont think we know one way or the other about how the daughters feel at this point.
For the reasons I have seen listed why one would feel he may be involved, the things that could support that are known items and not really assumptions. How we intrepet the facts can vary but there was some facts there.
Things like the immediate reward he put out so long as she is returned safely. That in itself is a fact it happened and not an assumption. Similar was the lack of any public statements until a brief homemade video was finally put out. That again is a fact that little public statements have been made which can come across as wanting to avoid public scrutiny and can be suspicous in itself to some.
The fact LE searched one of his job sites is a fact. How that is interpreted can vary but it is a fact it happened.
Anyway I am glad we have people with different views. I wish I could see more things in this case that can sway me in a different direction. At least for me, all arrows are pointing in a certain direction so far.
I respectfully disagree on certain points,
They are no more assumptions than yours.
LE has not said whether alibis check out. Not an assumption, fact.
LE has not made announcements as to what has been found in the consent vs search warrants, searches, not an assumption, fact.
Daughters are with father, several statements to this effect, not assumption, fact.
True, we do not know that this indicates trust in dad, we do not know either way. Fact.
LE has mixed opinions on rewards, they can bring out unwanted responses. they may have advised against it, assumption, not fact.
This may have prompted Spezze comment to “continue cooperating” assumption, not fact
I am not following you on mine being assumptions only.
I do agree to disagree, I feel compelled to respond, but neither of us has more facts than the other. IMHO
I am grateful to youfor allowing me to discuss without shutting me down.