Evd or "No Evidence Disputing" Several Points?
After ea point of
@Feistyomi below in blue, I've added some comments in black. Respectfully, imo, we/the public do not now have sufficient verifi
ed or verifi
able evd of these points to determine whether they are factual or non-factual. Not yet, altho likely LE has or will have info to verify or refute each of them. Looking at blue stmts in terms of whether they are
admissible as facts per
rules of evidence and/or what foundation would be required to be admissible.
1.
"He has an alibi."
(BM told youtuber, someone else, and/or LE?) he has an alibi, but AFAIK,
lacks LE's public release that his alibi was factual. Even if BM's alibi (in Denver or being 100+ miles away, or 2 hrs+ driving distance away from home) had been verified at time SM disappeared, does not exclude his involvement in SM's disappearance. Esp since
time and place of disappearance have not publicly released as LE-verified (if known even to LE).
2.
"There is evidence he is happily married and loves his wife."
AFAIK, above summarizes one person's (a relative? BM's uncle?) stmt of what he says he
believes, but does not state his factual basis for opn.
Subjective
Stmt;
one individual's opinion.
3.
"They are financially stable."
Altho some prop & county records show BM & SM's names as owners, and members here have said no mortgage is shown on public record, AFAIK no members posted about seeing M's income, net worth, & other financial stmts for the full picture.
Lacks publicly verifiable factual basis as of now, altho likely LE has info to verify or refute the numbers. Also to some degree 'financial stability' is a
subjective measure.
4.
"He did not bury evidence under slab."
AFAIK, LE (CCSO, CBI, FBI) has not publicly released info re findings from concrete slab 'dig.'
Lacks publicly verifiable factual basis as of now, altho likely LE has info to verify or refute it.
5.
"The house, vehicle, and electronics came back clear for him."
AFAIK, LE has not publicly released info re findings of that.
Lacks publicly verifiable factual basis as of now, altho likely LE has info to verify or refute it.
6.
"He actually has a job and is successful at it."
AFAIK, neither BM nor LE has publicly released employment information or documents, such as W-2, 1040, Schedules B, C or D, bank stmts, brokerage stmt, credit cards, etc., AFAIK.
Lacks publicly verifiable factual basis as of now, altho likely LE has info to verify or refute it.
7.
"His daughters trust him."
AFAIK, daughters have not made public stmts in MSM or soc med. about their trust in him. If they are living w him (at Puma Path or elsewhere), is it possible they are cowering in fear and arrange schedules to never alone w him? Also
subjective.
8.
"IMO, all of the above are just as accurate as our speculations of his guilt, we have no evidence disputing them, I could probably come up w/ more." bbm sbm
I'm not saying any one of ^ points is true or false; just saying for most ^ points, we do not/cannot know to be true or false at this moment, altho LE likely will have info (before trial of
anyone) to verify or refute. You have & each member has the right to develop own opinions; that's what makes WS an engaging place for reading & discussion.
