Just a random thought that has been on my mind (this is IMO, JMO):
I'm willing to, reluctantly, give BM the benefit of the doubt re: showing up for SMs vigil the other night. It's a long way to travel, it's clear that the person who organized it (AM) isn't exactly in his corner, and there could be a multitude of legitimate/semi-legitimate reasons why he didn't go. But what I was surprised by was the fact that nobody spoke for BM at the vigil. BM appears to have small cadre of supporters online, but none of them apparently were willing (or maybe, more likely, weren't asked?) to stand up and give a simple "I spoke with BM and he wishes he could be here and is so thankful for the support", etc. I'll readily admit that it's increasingly difficult to put myself in BMs shoes (assume he's innocent) and try to look at his actions through an objective lens, but this sticks in my craw, as my grandpa might have said. I can't think of a reason why an innocent, grieving husband wouldn't - at a minimum - want to make sure a message like that was shared with his hometown, even if the person organizing it is skeptical of your innocence. JMO.
