What if ... there was an older area with a previous burn.
Is it possible someone could do the 'smokeless fire' or similar burn over the bare, burned patch ?
And it wouldn't even be noticed ?
Js.
Wildland areas burned by wildfire have vegetation growing again within a year or two. Not big trees that fast, of course, but grasses and shrubs come in very fast. Exceptions would be areas burned so severely that the soil is sterilized.
IMO/experience
Not training, real actual burns that try to ward off coming fire. Fire fighters dig trenches and/burn a path, so the fire doesn't jump/continue. Using loose words here, no disrespect to those who risk their lives doing that, only know things from the news.
Learning about Colorado, wonder if they would do the same, since there was a warning to residents.
Edit: Seriously? Degree in Landscape Design?
As has been mentioned: controlled burns (also called prescribed burns) are done in winter and spring to reduce the severity of future wildfires. They are done by Federal Employees (US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, depending on what land is involved). Sometimes inmate crews are contracted for this, when it involves burning piles of brush rather than acres of landscape. Local/municipal/volunteer firefighters do NOT do this.
You might be referring to backburning, when they light a fire a distance from a current fire, and let the two burn together, in order to stop the forward progress of a wildfire. But that's during an active wildfire.
Once a wildfire is in progress on Federal land, an Incident Management System is used to coordinate personnel and strategy, and sometimes local/municipal fire agency personnel are involved. I doubt volunteers are included, though I could be wrong about that.
I might also add that the actual frontline folks out there cutting fireline are young. I believe those in career fire positions generally have a forced retirement age of 50. Of course on a big fire, there is a lot of administrative/bureaucratic stuff that employees of any age can do, but just as an FYI someone over 50 is not going to be out on the front lines of a wildland fire on Federal land.
I'm sure plenty of firefighter trainings have been cancelled or gone virtual -- all the sexual harassment trainings, for example, and the administrative topics, first aid, fire behavior, strategy, etc. But I promise that the firefighters awaiting this year's fire season have been to recent trainings for all the needed safety and skills stuff. Either they've adapted to social distancing during trainings, or they've all geared up with PPE in class, I don't know. But there WILL be fires this summer, there WILL be firefighters fighting them, and those firefighters WILL have received all the legally-required training. Guaranteed.
But again, that is all for Federal employees on Federal land. Other than it being in an area with a lot of Federal land nearby, I'm not sure what that has to do with this case. I have not seen anything to indicate that BLM would be involved with a fire on Federal land. He's going to get called to house fires, or vacant lot, etc. Car accidents, heart attacks, etc. The stuff a small town fire department deals with.
All IMO/In My Experience
ETA:
@Gigi3 said it much more succinctly
