My biggest take away from LS’ piece is that the CCSO was over budget before the end of August with 4 months left in the year because of overtime pay.
So I’d imagine all OT has been cutoff as of August. I’m sure the Sherriff understands a budget, and I’m betting he transferred the bulk of the case work to the CBI/FBI in August. (If not sooner)
The reason CCSO is so silent is because they are not leading the investigation right now and will not interfere by giving an update on the CBI/FBI work. Heck, the CBI/FBI might not even be updating the CCSO regularly. But the CBI/FBI will let CCSO make the arrest and take credit.
LS is just doing her job with a report like last night.
I think this is a key takeaway, as well. There are over 1300 missing persons in Colorado. This is a very publicized case, but virtual no LE agencies have the funds to sustain over-budget activities for long.
So I agree that it's likely that CBI/FBI is leading the investigation right now, which may mean that CCSO knows less than we might think and certainly isn't something the Sheriff wants to broadcast. Evidence of cost cutting is clear in the decision not to go get all that video footage before it disappeared. LE knows that most business owners don't have a ready way of preserving a lot of video footage and in the case of the Poncha Springs store, they have a witness that BM was there, they have the note - do they also need the video?
Sometimes on WS, we seem to think that LE should leave no stone unturned and should have collected hundreds of videos, if they were available. But I've never seen a real life investigation do that.
AM is correct to step up and start working the wheels of public opinion here - that's what gets missing persons cases going strong. Barbara Thomas's husband did squat. Zilch. Her son, who lived far away, proved to be unable to do what a more local person could have done and, like AM, was somewhat estranged from Barbara and RT. RT's lack of searching is the single largest clue that something intentional may have happened to Barbara. Other than that, she's just another person who went missing in a wilderness environment.
With what we know right now about Suzanne's disappearance, any good defense attorney could easily punch holes in a case against BM. What we don't know is BM's actual digital footprint. I suspect that LE has also uncovered a great deal about possible motive. But without a body, that footprint can be turned into argument that BM went where he went on those days, and Suzanne wasn't found anywhere near the places where BM happened to be.
No signs of a struggle in the house, no body, no time of death...this is a difficult case. LE may be close to pulling all the pieces together, but I get the sense they really wish they'd get a breakthrough, such as a key witness coming forward.
Looking back, the fact that LE banned BM and his volunteer friends from the original search is very telling. Something led them to that decision (and the decision to bar him from the house from Day 1).
What was it? Drives me crazy.