michmi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Messages
- 1,709
- Reaction score
- 357
In the Dr. Drew clip, he mentioned that doctors routinely recommend parents getting conservatorship over a child if they are noncompliant with treatment, and they often do not because of denial or not wanting to rock the boat.
Because they seem to disassociate themselves or maintain they had no responsibility for what their mentally ill adult child did, I wonder if making a parent legally responsible (including in any resulting lawsuits) would motivate some of them to take whatever measures are necessary to maintain the public's safety?
It's not exactly the same, but with people who have dementia, the spouse or family are usually reluctant to make the person stop driving, but when you point out to them that there can be financial and legal repercussions beyond what insurance will pay (and their own insurance company may refuse due to prior knowledge), the family often becomes motivated to do what is needed.
Some people are motivated by financial loss and nothing else.
Because they seem to disassociate themselves or maintain they had no responsibility for what their mentally ill adult child did, I wonder if making a parent legally responsible (including in any resulting lawsuits) would motivate some of them to take whatever measures are necessary to maintain the public's safety?
It's not exactly the same, but with people who have dementia, the spouse or family are usually reluctant to make the person stop driving, but when you point out to them that there can be financial and legal repercussions beyond what insurance will pay (and their own insurance company may refuse due to prior knowledge), the family often becomes motivated to do what is needed.
Some people are motivated by financial loss and nothing else.