EP, any chance these things are related to MJ's 2005 trial?
Yes, and drugs.
EP, any chance these things are related to MJ's 2005 trial?
I am fighting the same concern(s) that you just said. This isn't just about cut and dry guilty or not guilty, for me. I have watched too many talking heads and that leads you to guilty, but as a human being and using my common sense this case is very complicated. I just can't say that other Dr.'s haven't done the same. He was clearly a drug addict but I'm not sure that was proven in the testimony. Many people don't believe that he is a addict but I think he has been since his molestation trial.[/B][/B] I also think that is probably when he wanted to use propofal to not have to think about things because he couldn't sleep. That is just my own opinion. I also am probably one of the few but I have a problem with not knowing if CM put evidence in his pants pockets because that is only speculation and that piece of evidence wasn't among the evidence that was needed.
The procecution also stated that we will never know what happened. (In the closing arguments) That statement also bothered me because it proved that they didn't know and that could cause reasonable doubt.
I truly believe that if this wasn't Michael J, just a regular Joe this trial wouldn't be happening. JMOO
Thanks
I don't know why but I think this case is so different because I believe (know) that this case isn't as simple as it was made out to be.
Even though I think CM was wrong, I think there were many others and I guess that still doesn't excuse CM.
Yes, and drugs.
haven't commented on this trial but here goes----No doctor has ever given Propofol in a home setting. I'm a Pediatrician and have to say their are big time controls on any meds used for sedation. We use to given chloral hydrate to children before CT's and other procedures. At my rural Iowa hospital I can't even order this. It has to be administered by anesthesia - ie MD or nurse anesthesist ---and the children are monitored on cardio-apnea monitors and an Ambu bag is bedside. Same thing goes with Versed for conscious sedation. Propofol is administered in the OR and the patients are intubated and monitored by an anestheiologist. CM's actions are unconscionable. As Physicians we take the Hippocratic oath and must always follow the oath FIRST DO NO HARM!!! Thats all I'm going to say!!!!!! It embarrasses me that he is a doctor!!!!!
haven't commented on this trial but here goes----No doctor has ever given Propofol in a home setting. I'm a Pediatrician and have to say their are big time controls on any meds used for sedation. We use to given chloral hydrate to children before CT's and other procedures. At my rural Iowa hospital I can't even order this. It has to be administered by anesthesia - ie MD or nurse anesthesist ---and the children are monitored on cardio-apnea monitors and an Ambu bag is bedside. Same thing goes with Versed for conscious sedation. Propofol is administered in the OR and the patients are intubated and monitored by an anestheiologist. CM's actions are unconscionable. As Physicians we take the Hippocratic oath and must always follow the oath FIRST DO NO HARM!!! Thats all I'm going to say!!!!!! It embarrasses me that he is a doctor!!!!!
I know the trial that happened way back 6 years ago is off topic but I will say this.
We all could see that MJ was taking sedatives during the trial. Like Tom Mes. said 'who wouldnt?..... it was the most devastating time of his life that he was having to endure.' I don't even take meds but I sure would if I had been accused falsely of something this horrific. I would have to take them in order to get through it all.
People have to be treated if they truly need medication whether it is for pain or anxiety. We learned that in the trial about Anna Nicole Smith trial.
In fact iirc in 2006 a law was passed in California that a doctor cant refuse to treat anyone who they believe has legitimate pain or emotional issues.
IMO
I won't say anthing and it would't have anything to do with this trial.(unless it would have been brought into evidence.)
The only thing I will say is most people that have worked for MJ know stuff but sign a contract that they won't disclose things.
My daughter knows someone that know things not rumor.
I was really overwhelmed but I'm glad she hadn't told me earlier.
haven't commented on this trial but here goes----No doctor has ever given Propofol in a home setting. I'm a Pediatrician and have to say their are big time controls on any meds used for sedation. We use to given chloral hydrate to children before CT's and other procedures. At my rural Iowa hospital I can't even order this. It has to be administered by anesthesia - ie MD or nurse anesthesist ---and the children are monitored on cardio-apnea monitors and an Ambu bag is bedside. Same thing goes with Versed for conscious sedation. Propofol is administered in the OR and the patients are intubated and monitored by an anestheiologist. CM's actions are unconscionable. As Physicians we take the Hippocratic oath and must always follow the oath FIRST DO NO HARM!!! Thats all I'm going to say!!!!!! It embarrasses me that he is a doctor!!!!!
HLN's Jane Velez-Mitchell suggesting that Jackson family members might simply be headed for downtown L.A. hotels so that they are close to the Courthouse when a verdict is reached.
IMO
I wouldn't trust someone who says they worked for MJ, or any celebrity, that says they signed a contract
that stated they would NOT give out personal information, and then goes ahead and divulges personal information
about the person/celebrity for whom they're working.