GUILTY Conrad Murray Trial - Verdict Watch

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Mike G. says it was printed items and highlighter pens.
 
octobermoon said:
Mike G. says it was printed items and highlighter pens.
Click to expand...

Well ain't that interestin'?

I thought it was going to be the slit saline bag. So, I was wondering, what earthly reason would there have been to have a slit saline bag hanging on that pole, unless one was going to put something in it? Taking something out makes no sense, because it was at one time full of ....saline!
 
outofstatelawyer said:
Well ain't that interestin'?

I thought it was going to be the slit saline bag. So, I was wondering, what earthly reason would there have been to have a slit saline bag hanging on that pole, unless one was going to put something in it? Taking something out makes no sense, because it was at one time full of ....saline!
Click to expand...

Must have made sense to CM :waitasec::crazy::waitasec: LOL
 
I do have to say I am glad to hear they are looking over the evidence and not in a rush to get home unlike the P12 in Fla.
 
Dang it, now Mike G. saying no evidence was requested because it is already in the jury room with them. Reporter saying the only evidence that isn't is medically sensitive, drugs, etc.
 
Another random thought. Chernoff accused just about everyone of perjury, and added a few criminal allegations against Walgren, but the only people he didn't blame were...the police! Now, I understand he did that because the one detective said he didn't see the bottle in the slit bag, but how very weird that in a criminal case, where the defense always says the state didn't meet it's burden of proof, he left the entire LAPD off the hook. Johnnie Cochran must be rolling in his grave!
 
outofstatelawyer said:
Another random thought. Chernoff accused just about everyone of perjury, and added a few criminal allegations against Walgren, but the only people he didn't blame were...the police! Now, I understand he did that because the one detective said he didn't see the bottle in the slit bag, but how very weird that in a criminal case, where the defense always says the state didn't meet it's burden of proof, he left the entire LAPD off the hook. Johnnie Cochran must be rolling in his grave!
Click to expand...

"If the bag isn't slit, you must acquit!"
 
outofstatelawyer said:
Ok, I have to go run some errands, so it should guarantee a verdict while I'm out :)
Click to expand...


I ran to the botroom to relieve myself of... well you know...
and was sure there'd be a verdict in the 2 minutes I was gone. :)
 
JVM showing the protesters yelling at each other. One dude showed up in a Nixon mask. what decade/century does he think this is???? Goofy.
 
While I haven't been posting regularly on this board, I listened/watched some of the trial, watched HLN updates, and read WS for day-to-day posts on the proceedings. I got side-tracked by the Lisa Irwin disappearance but didn't give up entirely on the Conrad Murray trial.

I can't offer an opinion on what the verdict might be but hope that the jurors were able to remain alert and attentive through the sometimes very clinical, technical testimony that would have been a major challenge for me :blushing:

I expect a verdict by the end of the day. jmo
 
So on the fence about this. On one hand, it's pretty clear that MJ had many doctors, not just CM prescribe drugs he shouldn't have been using and he was clearly a drug addict. He also used his power of being a megastar with loads of money to get what he wanted. On the other hand, CM was on MJ's payroll and as a physician who is supposed to be practising moral ethics and aiding people in promoting health and saving lives, he is without question morally corrupt. I don't know if you can blame all the physicians that enabled MJ or we just fell upon one to take the fall for all parties including MJ and his life style.
 
Does anyone know the ages or the jurors?

My daughter is in her late 20's and was a MJ big fan, but she said some troubling things to me last night. I was wondering if there were some young jurors.

Thanks.
 
EPfan said:
Does anyone know the ages or the jurors?

My daughter is in her late 20's and was a MJ big fan, but she said some troubling things to me last night. I was wondering if there were some young jurors.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

I don't know much of anything about the jurors. I am not even sure if any info has been released. I didn't follow the pretrial hearings or voir dere (sp?).
Maybe some here did though.
 
EPfan said:
Does anyone know the ages or the jurors?

My daughter is in her late 20's and was a MJ big fan, but she said some troubling things to me last night. I was wondering if there were some young jurors.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

I think they are in their late 30s... 40s and mid 50s.

Michael has one of the biggest fan bases in the world. From the very young child all the way to people in their 80s.

My teenage grandchildren love his music and want justice for Michael.

IMO
 
This is a silly question, can they still talk/deliberate during lunch? Because if it were me I would be busting at the seams after all these weeks. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 137 more.
Total: 964 (members: 138, guests: 826)

Online statistics

Members online
138
Guests online
826
Total visitors
964
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
598,335
Messages
18,079,696
Members
230,613
Latest member
Mandi_lee
Back
Top