Good point. I too, would like more data, but the data is only good if it is reliable. Here's an example of what could happen when those being tested would be asked if they had participated in the protests: Number 1 answers yes, telling the truth. Number 2 answers no, which is a lie because they were there. Number three answers no, which is the truth, because they slept through the whole thing. Number four answers yes, which is a lie, because for some strange reason they just want to mess with the answers and make the protesters look worse. Given the possibility of these types of answers, I don't see how anyone could evaluate the data to get to the truth. I could be wrong, but I see possible problems. MOO