Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No you misunderstood.
No one said SG was brought into Hacketts after she was found.
I believe Judge Berland had scheduled a hearing on December 11, 2018 did it occur? Any news?
If I understand correctly, JR filed a motion asking Judge Berland to impose sanctions (against SCPD for failure to comply). No decision was made regarding that motion. Additionally, there was PIC/OSC (preindictment conference/order to show cause) scheduled for 1/7 or 1/8. Which I very poorly (i.e. I'm just guessing!) interpret as...
(Warning! Anyone with legal training will possibly become violently ill with continued reading! Many apologies in advance!)
PIC = produce what was requested (tapes/transcripts) so we can resolve the matter. And, OSC = SCPD is given an opportunity to show why the judge should not take drastic action for failure to comply.
We really need an attorney to explain stuff 'round here.
You did a perfect job of explaining it. One has to file an OSC when the opposing party doesn’t comply with a previous order of the court. I’m not quite sure why they lumped the Pre-Indictment Conference with the OSC though. Anyway, Judges normally give the responding party some leeway to produce whatever they were ordered to produce. If they don’t do it after this next OSC there is a good chance that the plaintiff’s next motion will ask for terminating sanctions. In other words, the plaintiff will ask the judge to dismiss the lawsuit and enter a judgment in their favor.If I understand correctly, JR filed a motion asking Judge Berland to impose sanctions (against SCPD for failure to comply). No decision was made regarding that motion. Additionally, there was PIC/OSC (preindictment conference/order to show cause) scheduled for 1/7 or 1/8. Which I very poorly (i.e. I'm just guessing!) interpret as...
(Warning! Anyone with legal training will possibly become violently ill with continued reading! Many apologies in advance!)
PIC = produce what was requested (tapes/transcripts) so we can resolve the matter. And, OSC = SCPD is given an opportunity to show why the judge should not take drastic action for failure to comply.
We really need an attorney to explain stuff 'round here.
affidavit
*Judicial Proceedings**
Affidavits serve as evidence in civil actions and criminal prosecutions in certain instances. They are considered a very weak type of evidence because they are not taken in court, and the affiant is not subject to cross-examination. Their use is usually restricted to times when no better evidence can be offered. If a witness who has made an affidavit is not available to testify at a trial, his or her affidavit may be admitted as evidence. If the witness is present, his or her affidavit is inadmissible except when used to impeach the witness's testimony, or to help the witness with past recollection of facts.
4/2/19 court date scheduled. And it appears no sanctions against SCPD for failing to cough up the required info on SGs 911 call.
'Feel as if I could be posting same info a year (or ten) from now.
Any news on any of the Court actions?
10/22/19 "nothing to be accomplished" court date
I told you before and I'm telling you for the last time,
the punishment and the sanctions are proposed against Michael Pak.
John Ray asked me for Pak's address on June 1 of this year.
I told Pak and Pak called Ray because he is a nincompoop.
Ray only wanted Paks address to depose Pak, and Pak was under
the false sense of security that 8 years and 1 month had gone by
and that he was off the hook, while his co-conspirator
the doc, was ON the hook.
I, myself am pessimistic that the lawsuit will be resolved satisfactorily
simply because the government in many cases refuses to divulge the information to the judge and the lawyer,
and Windsor's favorite lawyer is going to be disbarred in 2019 for violations against Shannan Gilbert,
Mari Gilbert, Sherre Gilbert, Sarra Gilbert and Stevie Smith in the canon of ethics that lawyers
take an oath to obey.
John took $25,000 cash from a certain crime syndicate
family that resides in Oak Beach to depose Hackett and all the
same people that this crime syndicate family hates.
What is their interest in this lawsuit against the doc,
except the fact that they have slandered the docs name
for about 8 years, defaming him on numerous websites,
in thousands, if not millions of posts.
It is a 3rd party inserting themselves into a 2 party lawsuit.
The courts, and or Hackett's lawyer will do what ever they
do to John Ray and this crime syndicate family.
Was the cash payment was a cash bribe, because it's
awful strange that they never filled out the proper
paperwork to tell opposing counsel that they "donated"
(cough cough AHEM) or,
"donated" the monies, therefore it's a secret.
There are formalities by the rules of law that
are to be filled out when a 3rd
party involves themselves in a 2party lawsuit.
First and foremost is that the crime syndicate family can
influence John Ray and the workings of this lawsuit.
Secondly, you will notice that Ray never deposed, nor
sued Pak, a man who was at the scene of the crime.
I can tell you that this said syndicate crime family
did not TELL JR to go after Pak o lies, and so John didn't.
But, don't believe me
ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.
Pak was the only person Shannan was running from,
Pak drover her there, and he lives and operates in
a crime syndicate a true criminal enterprise.
Last, but not least, Judge Berland placed a "stay" on the
case.
John's movement in this case is once again frozen.
His hands are tied.
Ray can't get near Pak, and Pak doesn't have to be deposed.
Fred&Edna - you are doing very well, as you are not an attorney,
nor seem to have any attorneys at your elbow to help you.
You are doing very well by trying, lawyers go to law school for
3 years after they complete their college education, and that
is why the law is written BY lawyers for lawyers so that
the people have to HIRE an attorney, because otherwise
we, the common people will never understand the law.
I am very proud of you for trying. It's not easy,
the only reason I know that this "punishment" Is
for Pak is because, as crazy as it is, John Ray told me.