Crime Scene Photos #3 ***WARNING - GRAPHIC DISCUSSION***

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I don't know how to paste and browse. I just put in angles for stacy in my yahoo search and that is how i found it. It gives all the names of the people that have been interviewed and also some pictures. Almost everything about this case is on that sight. Hope u can find it. When my grandaughter gets home from work i will see if she knows how to paste to the browser.

Thanks again, Dispatcher. OK, I think I understand now. You are seeing the "Angels for Stacy" website. Got it. Thanks!
 
The canvas bag is rather clean. It doesn't appear to have obviously been stained or coated with dirt/mud. If it was submerged, the water may not have been very muddy.


I can't help being reminded of my own comment about the relatively clean canvas bag after today's doc dump. The State's expert botanist witness apparently said that the remains had been in the woods between six to two months.

Will Kronk's August swamp visits become critical at the trial?
 
I can't help being reminded of my own comment about the relatively clean canvas bag after today's doc dump. The State's expert botanist witness apparently said that the remains had been in the woods between six to two months.

Will Kronk's August swamp visits become critical at the trial?
The manufacturer's web site implied that the bag was made of some sort of impregnated fabric so that it could be wiped down. I wonder if that would allow it to be somewhat rinsed by rainfall?
 
The manufacturer's web site implied that the bag was made of some sort of impregnated fabric so that it could be wiped down. I wonder if that would allow it to be somewhat rinsed by rainfall?

I didn't know that and it sure could help explain why the bag looks clean. I was thinking that a non-treated light-colored canvas bag ought to look pretty dirty under such conditions.
 
I don't know how to paste and browse. I just put in angles for stacy in my yahoo search and that is how i found it. It gives all the names of the people that have been interviewed and also some pictures. Almost everything about this case is on that sight. Hope u can find it. When my grandaughter gets home from work i will see if she knows how to paste to the browser.


To post a link to a website within a message:

1. Go to the website.
2. Take your Cursor and HIGHLIGHT the website address in the address box (turns blue)
3. Right click and click COPY
4. Go to your reply or message you are creating in WS.. Right click and click on Paste. This will create a "link" to the website for us to click on. If you need any further help. Please let me know and I can help.
 
Something os bothering me as I read the list of "found Items".

broken tripod / disposable camera / photo paper

What's all that about I wonder.

I always wondered about the tripod, too, I expected a camera tripod of some kind but never saw one in the pics, was the detective referring to the little wire stand that the kindercare sign might have been on? That's all I could think of.
 
...hafta comment on the sad, sad irony of the Kindercare sign @ the crime scene. :(

I know. Too sad.
And why/how would it be there actually? Someone promoting their kindercare center wouldn't throw it away there, they would no doubt put it in the closet when they were through with it or maybe in their trash. Who would throw it there? Would someone uproot someone else's kindercare sign just to dump it there, what for? For it to be there near Caylee seems too ironic to me (but I admit I'm suspicious of many things.) I do wonder what the roll of film has on it.
 
I know. Too sad.
And why/how would it be there actually? Someone promoting their kindercare center wouldn't throw it away there, they would no doubt put it in the closet when they were through with it or maybe in their trash. Who would throw it there? Would someone uproot someone else's kindercare sign just to dump it there, what for? For it to be there near Caylee seems too ironic to me (but I admit I'm suspicious of many things.) I do wonder what the roll of film has on it.

Why was all the other trash at the scene? This sign could have floated in from somewhere after the hurricane. I don't think someone necessarily placed it there. Remember that area was under water for months. Sad as it is...I just don't see someone deliberating placing the Kinder Care sign exactly where Caylee's remains were found. JMO.
 
I know. Too sad.
And why/how would it be there actually? Someone promoting their kindercare center wouldn't throw it away there, they would no doubt put it in the closet when they were through with it or maybe in their trash. Who would throw it there? Would someone uproot someone else's kindercare sign just to dump it there, what for? For it to be there near Caylee seems too ironic to me (but I admit I'm suspicious of many things.) I do wonder what the roll of film has on it.

I would bet that sign was 'blown' there during Fay. I can see Kindercare putting a sign along the road that leads to the school as advertising. YOu see all sorts of sign on the side of th road around here. It probably got either blown into the woods or washed into the woods during Fay.
 
I have a treeline behind my house .... in a subdivision..... in the middle of central Illinois......no hurricanes.... and

you would be shocked at how much trash and debris end up stuck in the ditch and trees down there after fall and winter!

I'm not surprised by the Kindercare sign (although eery!) or tripod or film or lots of other trash.
 
Sorry guy's this is OT.......................But Gypsy your sig pic OH MY GAWD :applause::bowdown: BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!





Side note Vitamin water really sucks coming out your nose :eek:


Sorry for the OT you guy's are awesome I have been in this thread reading up for awhile and applaude your hard work and sleuthing :clap:
 
Moving discussion here from Heart sticker thread:

And that "spotted" Kitty was something else indeed!!! So, after a few months have passed, what do you now think that "kitty" was? Just an optical illusion or perhaps a blanket or something that REALLY had a kitty print. Just wondering? It honestly freaks me out cause it looks "too" much like a kitty print, rather than an illusion....

(As someone who NEVER saw the book as a book...instead, saw it as a flat yellow advertising sign....Who was right? Oh yeah...me!)
I knew from the start it was not a kitty. The scale was all wrong It would have to have been tiny and I commented that at the time. Like all the photo things, it was a combination of leaves and light and dark and the human tendency to see vague info as ordered shapes, especially faces. There are some famous examples such as a huge face on mars? It's all loosely described as optical illusion, and at WS with a huge double dash of wishful thinking!

PS I think we are OT and should move photo snooping to the crime scene photo thread.
 
I would bet that sign was 'blown' there during Fay. I can see Kindercare putting a sign along the road that leads to the school as advertising. YOu see all sorts of sign on the side of th road around here. It probably got either blown into the woods or washed into the woods during Fay.

OMG-can hardly believe I'm reading about this sign again. OF COURSE it was innocently blown back into the woods. DUH!
(It was an advestising sign, NOT Caylee's book she was reading at the Nursing Home). DUH! Is about the most intelligent thing I can think of to post. Already angry that others here never gave me credit for Iding this sign as a "sign". Oh well...
 
Why was all the other trash at the scene? This sign could have floated in from somewhere after the hurricane. I don't think someone necessarily placed it there. Remember that area was under water for months. Sad as it is...I just don't see someone deliberating placing the Kinder Care sign exactly where Caylee's remains were found. JMO.

__________________________________________

ITA with your post. I just have to tell you ( as a recent reader & very shy poster)
that your photo at the bottom made me laugh out loud for the first time at this site! Thank you!
 
__________________________________________

ITA with your post. I just have to tell you ( as a recent reader & very shy poster)
that your photo at the bottom made me laugh out loud for the first time at this site! Thank you!

no need to be shy, zoomom
welcome-1.gif
 
no need to be shy, zoomom
welcome-1.gif

THANK YOU EDDEVA!!! Being totally FLOORED by this b.s. story on NG from the minute I saw it in July, I went looking for more information. Stumbled on this site. LOVED IT!!! I recently discovered there was a previous poster named "zoomomology" ( or something close to that,- and it said BANNED under her name). I am afraid people will think I am that person trying to "re-post" and ignore my newbie posts. I have raised 4 kids, have 3 grandkids, and recently resigned from my 10 + year position at an accredited Zoo. I have been ZooMom for a few years on different web sites. No, I'm not a Brainiac (unless you ask me about Pangolins, tarantulas, or Juvenile male primates) but I have grandkids by a daughter the same age as KC. So I am VERY interested in the pathology of this case. Thanks again for the welcome.....!
 
Maybe i shouldn't have said any of that on this thread. OT. Where should I go??? I need to clarify a thing or two.......
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
67
Guests online
169
Total visitors
236

Forum statistics

Threads
609,498
Messages
18,254,913
Members
234,664
Latest member
wrongplatform
Back
Top