oceancalling
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2019
- Messages
- 643
- Reaction score
- 10,727
100% agree. There is absolutely no evidence that Judge Heller acted improperly or otherwise allowed FD to "get away" with misbehavior. If anything, she clearly saw through his BS and responded accordingly. Yes, FD was highly manipulative and did everything possible to avoid disclosing required financial information. Unfortunately, that's a fairly common practice by well-funded litigants in all civil cases; this tactic is not exclusive to family court.It's more common with people with money to drag these things out. Because other people can't afford to do as much aggressive litigation.
It is not true at all, however, that he wasn't punished by the system. I keep seeing this statement that he was somehow getting away with something. But I think sometimes people's personal experiences and dissatisfaction with the system has colored how they view this case.
Because despite all his riches, custody was basically taken from him and he was reduced to what was basically almost the most restrictive custody and visitation plan available. First all contact with his kids was suspended and then it was super limited and monitored by a therapist. There were additional serious conditions imposed.
I have explained over and over that this is very rare and very punitive. This is reserved for the worst parents OR the ones with the most serious issues like drug issues or mental health breaks.
What we have to understand is that for Jennifer, custody of her kids likely was he issue that had the highest priority in her divorce. The court would treat it the same way. So discovery battles (about disclosing evidence upon demand) would take longer while the parties focused on child custody.
Finally, as I have explained several times, the court system doesn't have as much money as it needs to run super smoothly. So the court calendars are typically super impacted. That creates delays. And an aggressive litigator with enough money can take advantage of that.
These points are why FD had not had to face the music when it came to disclosing his financial information, sooner. But he was at that point when it was coming to a head and that's when Jennifer disappeared. Conveniently.
Corruption and pay offs did not occur here. Not close. It does frustrate me that the family law court system continually gets blamed on Jennifer's threads. I can attest, as a family law attorney, that there is zero basis for it.
If there was corruption his kids never would have been taken from him. Clearly he considers them his property and I believe he killed Jennifer in large part because he was not going to allow the court or his wife tell him when he could be with his kids. I think he feels that's his right. That they are his and he is the only one who should be able to dictate who they see and when.
As others here have pointed out, though, FD's stalling tactics were coming to an end. He was being backed into a corner and I feel certain Judge Heller was NOT going to let him weasel out of that corner. Unfortunately, we now know what FD's response was to his fear/anger that he was going to have to disclose evidence of his fraudulent activities, including money laundering.(JMO). But again, I see zero evidence that a "corrupt" system was assisting FD in his scheme.
I do question the GAL's premature, and from all indications unauthorized, release of that last report. I also wonder what JD's lawyer discovered that resulted in an expert witness leaving the stand during the last hearing and his subsequent refusal to return for what was certain to be further devastating cross-examination. It seems clear JD's lawyer was in possession of information that was going to be extremely damaging to that expert's testimony and credibility. It will be interesting to see what that information was. The GAL and the supposed expert witness may well have stepped outside the bounds of their assigned responsibilities. If either of them actually committed misconduct in the way they conducted themselves, their reputations are now toast.
Still, I feel quite certain these issues would have been resolved by the presiding judge had they been brought to her attention. If now revealed, they most certainly WILL be addressed by whoever is in charge of judicial administration in that courthouse. Still, those seeming missteps are no reflection of the family law judge and are not evidence she (or the system) was corrupt. From the court record, it appears JD was extremely well represented by very experienced counsel, who did a fantastic job of exposing FD's true nature. I believe FD's frustration at NOT being able to manipulate the judicial system may well have been at least part of the reason he began planning this murder.