Silver Alert CT- Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 #8 *ARRESTS*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
And put his ball cap on and driven her car right out of her garage and down her driveway to wherever he disposed of herJMO
OOOH, I think you are on to something. And then he drove from the disposal site to Waveny Park, where he switched vehicles. She could be in some remote area of New Canaan (or near New Canaan) that nobody has thought to search.
 
Yes but we are concerned about the touch DNA defense - he was at the house 2 days prior with his children

This is where things will get sketchy, IMO. Supposedly witness says FD did not go into house and even stated "I don't want my DNA in there" (paraphrasing).
So when DNA comes back in/on faucet......how does his defense explain? Did he wash his hands/touch the faucet or not?
He can't have it both ways.
 
As long as FD is not charged with murder, NP is free to muddy the waters away with regards to FDs alibi on the day of the 24th. He has also changed his statements a few times with regard to said FD alibi. To wit: NP first said he was able to account for almost all of the time for FD, then he said meeting with attorney and phone call from Greece, then he said most recently that FD couldn’t have driven to NC and back and killed JD and disposed of her body in 4 and 1/2 hours. He’s just doing what he does and I won’t pay anything he says about the critical hours of May 24th into mind until LE and the prosecution present a timeline. Which they will do when he is charged with murder. NP has given up on the Hartford trashbin odyssey of stupidity dump because that’s been proven with CCTV and cell phone data and he’s given up on trying to provide an alibi for that.
I think Pattis can say anything he wants until some judge puts a gag order on him. He seems to be hurrying to spread as much garbage as he can until that happens.
 
Yep if it was used prior it would have a barcode if the label was intact - just how thorough was FD?

If by thorough, you mean handing LE and the Prosecution a nearly slam dunk case for tampering with evidence and hindering the prosecution in the first degree, then yes he was extremely thorough and downright helpful. :cool::)
 
They knew to go to Albany st based on the cctv and recovered the bags that had not been picked up for collection yet - see para 11 of the warrant - I’m guessing they retrieved the uncollected bags that week tested the contents and found JDs blood and subsequently made the arrest/ exact dates are not listed in the warrant that I can find regarding the collection but I do think it was around 5/31 ?
@MassGuy .
Help me out here. When did they get the phones?
Was it not until around 2 on Saturday?
Didn't they go to Albany ave. at that time or a few hours after?
Am I losing it?
Walk me through it.
TIA.
Hey Bunky. You liked it but didn't answer it.:D
 
I think Pattis can say anything he wants until some judge puts a gag order on him. He seems to be hurrying to spread as much garbage as he can until that happens.

And he gets on tv and radio every day so if this case goes south fast in a hurry or the money dries up people all over NY and CT know his name and will remember he is available for hire.
 
This is where things will get sketchy, IMO. Supposedly witness says FD did not go into house and even stated "I don't want my DNA in there" (paraphrasing).
So when DNA comes back in/on faucet......how does his defense explain? Did he wash his hands/touch the faucet or not?
He can't have it both ways.
The visit would have been supervised and perhaps the witness was the person supervising.
 
Oh my word.I just found it. It wasn't a day later but a week later. Feeling a tad sick.
May 31 - LE in Hartford attempting to retrieve garbage bags dumped by FD and MT (CCTV shows them dumping 30 bags/30 stops along a 4 mile stretch of Albany ave and cell phone pings (both) match this route. Altered license plates are recovered that were stuffed down a storm drain. Plates were from a vehicle previously owned by FD all on 5/24)
 
If by thorough, you mean handing LE and the Prosecution a nearly slam dunk case for tampering with evidence and hindering the prosecution in the first degree, then yes he was extremely thorough and downright helpful. :cool::)
I really meant if he did re-use a fedex box and left the label on well that would not be thorough - if he did remove the shipping label well then I would say he was thorough and if it was a new box then it’s a moot point IMO
 
The visit would have been supervised and perhaps the witness was the person supervising.

Right, so a key piece of evidence may come down to the supervising agent? Did this person follow FD around all night? I'm playing devil's advocate because I foresee this being a sticking point. FD can't say he's not going in the house and then have DNA show up. He can't play it both ways.
 
ITA. Doesn’t it speak volumes that NP keeps changing his story? I hope the state’s attorney is noting every change and will mention it in court as the “truth” doesn’t keep changing. Just like if a defendant’s story kept changing during questioning by LE would be suspicious.

Unfortunately, what the attorney says is not evidence. It won't be admitted at trial.
 
Right, so a key piece of evidence may come down to the supervising agent? Did this person follow FD around all night? I'm playing devil's advocate because I foresee this being a sticking point. FD can't say he's not going in the house and then have DNA show up. He can't play it both ways.
I guess you are right, it just might. I think it is the supervising persons responsibility to remain in contact with the person and within earshot of conversations etc. If FD was not allowed in the house, it would be responsibility to see that he doesn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
199
Guests online
269
Total visitors
468

Forum statistics

Threads
608,489
Messages
18,240,278
Members
234,388
Latest member
devrakegley
Back
Top