Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #32

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nanobody said:
Based on my limited understanding they could present something like that argument in criminal court as part of their defense, but it could become slander or libel when/if NP inevitably discussed the possibility with the press.
Click to expand...
Its a tricky question I believe as we have seen Atty. P., Atty R. and Atty BM all use motions and depositions to get around the 'gag order' restrictions in the criminal case. I do wonder if the ongoing situation will get so bad that a seal will be placed on all documents in the criminal and family court cases?

The only thing the 'gag order' has done is blessedly stop Atty. P. from speaking in a speculative manner to the Press about the victim as he instead shifting this type of dialog of his into motions which because they were public are then reported on by the Press.

This same issue happened with the LA deposition by Atty BM. Atty BM had nearly 4 pages full of questions that LA would not answer under guidance of counsel but yet the Press still reported on those questions and so the name of the boyfriend was introduced into the public domain. The Atty BM depositions questions weren't introduced IMO to be answered by LA but rather to lay the foundation as a possible alternative theory in the criminal defense, which yet again shows the involvement of Atty. P. in everything that is going on with FD legal situation.
MOO
 
Outforjustice said:
If we “pretend” the money was a gift , can anyone estimate /calculate what his taxes would be ?
Click to expand...

No where near $2.2 million and perhaps that is what FD is banking on.

With a Loan, FD owes the Full amount to the HF Estate but he would only pay a fraction of the full amount, in gift taxes. There could also be Interest owed, on the gift taxes since the gift tax has never been paid.

IMO.
 
]I feel as though we may need to create some new words for this. Tawdry, reprehensible, appalling—none of the words I can think of come close to describing this. MOO.[/QUOTE] BBM
I also think that when we want to use "forbidden" words we should just type "REDACTED"...then we can all just fill in the blank for the word we think best fits the situation...just adding a little chuckle to all the BS from FD (oops -- REDACTED)...LOL! moo
 
sds71 said:
@SabinaKuriakose


Weinstein:”Did you keep track of how many hours you spent sunbathing versus how many hours you spent discussing...investments?”
Dulos: “No.”
Farber’s family attny attacking Dulos on business travel expenses
@WTNH
Click to expand...

I have a question about charging of business expenses...can anybody claim that expenses are for the purpose of business, if they own a company, or do you have to show some sort of recent success that can be related to these expenses. For example, must FD show that he has obtained some recent investors, or some completed agreements to build for some person or entity? I don’t think he has “built” anything in the 2+ years since Jennifer left him, and maybe not anything since before his father-in-law died, with the exception of the house in New Canaan where EE was working on May 24th of this year. The charges he is claiming to be business expenses (all of the travel for himself, MT, and daughter, as well as everything else) don’t seem to be associated with much of anything actually happening in his business. Does the IRS care about something like this?
 
Jmoose said:
I have a question about charging of business expenses...can anybody claim that expenses are for the purpose of business, if they own a company, or do you have to show some sort of recent success that can be related to these expenses. For example, must FD show that he has obtained some recent investors, or some completed agreements to build for some person or entity? I don’t think he has “built” anything in the 2+ years since Jennifer left him, and maybe not anything since before his father-in-law died, with the exception of the house in New Canaan where EE was working on May 24th of this year. The charges he is claiming to be business expenses (all of the travel for himself, MT, and daughter, as well as everything else) don’t seem to be associated with much of anything actually happening in his business. Does the IRS care about something like this?
Click to expand...
To claim a loss to the IRS you typically have to show income (for that year). They do care. They want to see if the losses are legit. Not sure what he claimed for those years, but I'll bet the IRS would have a field day with ALL years he filed - and those in which he did not, as well.
 

@davealtimari

Weinstein focusing on some of the travel that Dulos went on. Like a sailing trip to St. Thomas with an old Brown friend who had invested money in the Fore Group. Dulos claims it was business expense. Weinstein points out the potential investor actually lives in Rhode Island.
 
  1. Zinnia Maldonado‏Verified account @ZinniaDee_TV 5m5 minutes ago
    Weinstein says 2007 Chevy Surburban was used by Almeida to transport the children while babysitting, the same vehicle is listed under the Fore Group, asks #FotisDulos if he kept track of milage used for babysitting, Dulos says no @FOX61News





  2. Zinnia Maldonado‏Verified account @ZinniaDee_TV 9m9 minutes ago
    Weinstein brings up #FotisDulos multiple trips to Miami for “business purposes yet #MichelleTroconis family also lives in Miami” asks did he keep track of time he spent “jet skiing” and time spent on “business” meetings with investors for reimbursement purposes @FOX61News



    I have to admit to being surprised that FD made no attempt to document business related calls/meetings etc. while traveling, especially as in his deposition he had previously admitted to not making any business related efforts in Miami and CO on those trips. I would guess that the IRS or CT Dept of Revenue would have a field day with the books and records at FORE/FD, but I'm not sure FD cares much. There doesn't appear to have been any attempt made by FD/FORE to comply with Federal IRS and State regulations, even at the most basic level based on what we have heard about today in Court. Not surprised, but if you are going to run a sham such as this you would think that the records might be a bit more convincing? Perhaps he thought he would never get caught or that the situation would never reach the level of a trial in Civil Court? The trial though doesn't seem to be stopping his inability to tell the truth which actually is probably the sad precursor of things we will see in the Criminal Cases IMO. MOO
 
kimch33kim said:
Deposition says that JD checks were written out to FD and not FORE
Click to expand...


Who is to say that FD reimbursed FORE after receiving the money from JFd?

Would that not be Fraud on FD's part?

Is this one of the ways that FD stole money to enrich his own pockets when he was to reimburse FORE, when FORE is the one paying for LA's Nanny Services?

I bet LA's W2's always included both her hours for FORE and for Nanny Services, which could indicate that FD claimed her entire income as FORE Expenses.

The more expenses FORE had, then fewer taxes FORE paid.

Then the check that JFd wrote directly to FD for Nanny Services, went directly into FD's pocket.

Slimy, Slimy, Slimy at it's best.

IMO.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 116 more.
Total: 322 (members: 117, guests: 205)

Online statistics

Members online
117
Guests online
205
Total visitors
322
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
609,019
Messages
18,248,530
Members
234,523
Latest member
MN-Girl
Back
Top