Money launderingsds71, I'm confused..why would the Feds be after MT?
It's just so hard for women to get freed from these types of men. These type of guys will do anything it seems to take the women down... even risking their own future to do it!Yes—you are so right! As awful as it is, this horrible crime has shed some light on some very dark corners, and, I know we all hope, that light may have opened some eyes and minds about domestic violence, abuse, corruption, and archaic views and actions related to domestic violence. MOO.
DuplicateYes—you are so right! As awful as it is, this horrible crime has shed some light on some very dark corners, and, I know we all hope, that light may have opened some eyes and minds about domestic violence, abuse, corruption, and archaic views and actions related to domestic violence. MOO.
So - FD hearing is 1/6 OR 1/7 - anyone?? and if you know "what" time? TIA!
1/7 @ 10am
The day after his name day
Thinking about MT's daughter:
- I know this is an unpopular opinion but I think for the sake of the child that her mother should be the one
to pick her up at the airport. I am anti-MT but I am pro-children having what is best for them. Her mother
picking her up is best for her. IMO
10 also 1/31Thank you sds71! And the time on MT's hearing!
Love the CW reference!"I wish Jennifer and her family happy holidays".
Uh, nobody's buying that line, Mr. Dulos. You just made a Chris Watts' mistake!
Looking at the look on FD 'sisters' face while FD is wishing Jennifer Dulos "Happy Holidays" is priceless IMO."I wish Jennifer and her family happy holidays".
Uh, nobody's buying that line, Mr. Dulos. You just made a Chris Watts' mistake!
So excited that I found some vintage Monopoly money this am so I plan to enclose some of that in my letters to FD!View attachment 219090 Is anyone else here sad that Fotis Dulos just might not be getting his annual $14,000 Holiday Check from the Farber Family?
I'm not at all sad but I do plan to pop a FAUX check in the mail addressed as follows as I am sure FD won't be getting any checks anytime soon from GF, even though he claims 'that was the deal' in Civil Court:
Mr. Fotis Dulos
4 Jefferson Crossing
Farmington, CT 06032
In case he is evicted in the interim I plan to send a duplicate FAUX check to:
Mr. Fotis Dulos
80 Mountain Spring Road
Farmington, CT 06032
AND in case the 2 above missives aren't received at those 2 addresses then another one to:
Mr. Fotis Dulos
61 Sturbridge Hill Road
New Canaan, CT 06840
Sadly I wish that we could send the checks to:
Mr. Fotis Dulos
C/O Bridgeport Jail
Bridgeport, CT
But perhaps next year this might be possible!
Attached is a sample of a stock check for purposes of discussion:
View attachment 219090
MOO
I saw that one too. My sense is that most veteran defense folks think the logical step for MT would be a deal with the State. I don't think anyone on WS would disagree with that view. Sure deals take awhile to put together but what is fascinating with MT is that she lied to LE for a good long while and during that time frame where she wasn't helpful and lying that LE was hitting the ground HARD on their case and uncovering all kinds of additional evidence against BOTH MT and FD IMO. We are now 6 months post JFd missing date and the investigation is still ongoing. We haven't ever heard from LE except via the AWs to know what all has possibly been uncovered in the investigation. We do know that MT got a second AW, and so was treated just like FD except with a lower bail amount and a courtesy arrest notice. We also don't know if further talks have been held between MT and LE either.a while back someone posted the website of Law & Crime and one feature there is a wrap up of interesting cases called the Daily Debrief. last night i watched it and at about 7:20 in they discussed MT and her recent visit to court. interesting to me is the discussion was about any possibility of MT making a deal in a possible upcoming criminal case. something to the effect that all the delays might be a "dance" between the prosecutors and defense over trying to work out a deal. MOO anyway,
about 7:20 in for the MT discussion,
Law & Crime
You are absolutely correct with all you say here IMO about MT and her daughter.I have another unpopular opinion: Maybe MT's daughter loves her and wants to be with her for the holidays. MT has not been convicted in a court of law, another unpopular opinion. (sorry if I screwed up my response to this post)
That's my guess!a while back someone posted the website of Law & Crime and one feature there is a wrap up of interesting cases called the Daily Debrief. last night i watched it and at about 7:20 in they discussed MT and her recent visit to court. interesting to me is the discussion was about any possibility of MT making a deal in a possible upcoming criminal case. something to the effect that all the delays might be a "dance" between the prosecutors and defense over trying to work out a deal. MOO anyway,
about 7:20 in for the MT discussion,
Law & Crime
Yes, he's insisting that JD is in hiding and alive, and in less than a minute he's saying MY children... as if she's dead. Slipped up!Looking at the look on FD 'sisters' face while FD is wishing Jennifer Dulos "Happy Holidays" is priceless IMO.
View attachment 219140
I do wonder if this fits well into her description of her brother as being, "...the nicest person I know."???????
Sorry, but I'm just not seeing the fit here Rena as your brothers comments were neither NICE NOR KIND and the ongoing references to MY CHILDREN are getting quite old as well too IMO.
Last I heard the Dulos children had BOTH a mother AND a father so this would IMO correctly imply usage of OUR CHILDREN. The use of MY children as a reference implies ownership and no human being ever belongs to another human being as by most definitions this would be considered SLAVERY.
MOO
I don't think MT will talk unless she gets a deal from the Feds.
but I also don't think she"ll escape only because they've invested too much in (nbt) to do so.
they've already limited any endorsements deals she'll get. if MT goes on the run there won't be any at all.
they have their eyes on the prize