Deceased/Not Found CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 ARRESTS #53

doodles1211 · May 26, 2019

New Canaan Police are looking for a missing woman Saturday, May 25.

Jennifer Dulos, 50, was reported missing around 7:30 p.m. Friday, May 24. A sliver alert has been issued.

New Canaan Police with the assistance of the Connecticut State Police initiated a search and an investigation both of which are ongoing as of 8:45 am. Saturday..

Anyone with information related to Dulos’s whereabouts should contact Sgt. Joseph Farenga at 203-505-1332.

Sillybilly · Feb 3, 2020

ADMIN NOTE:

Welcome to our new members.

Please review THE RULES, particularly those called “Etiquette & Information” and “Social Media: Facebook, Twitter, etc.”, some of which are as follows:

Do not bring social media comments by the general public to Websleuths. They are considered rumor and are off limits. You can summarize information from an original post on a LE or MSM FB page. No copy and paste, no screenshots, and you must include a link.

Unless LE indicates that an individual is a POI/suspect, that individual is OFF LIMITS to sleuthing and speculation. Please keep your suspicions to yourself.

WS is VICTIM FRIENDLY. No sleuthing of family members, especially parents and spouses. We give them the benefit of the doubt and the last thing we want to do is re-victimize a grieving loved one.

Theories, opinion, speculation are welcome as long as they are based on FACTS that have been made available through mainstream media (MSM), law enforcement (LE), or other acceptable sources such as scholarly or professional publications.

When you state something as "fact", you must back it up with a link to an approved source. If you can't link it, you can't post it.

Copyright rules require that no more than 10% of any article may be copied and members must give credit to the source by providing a link. Again, if you can't link it, you can't post it. No link, no post.

Websleuths does not allow linking to unapproved sites, so if you happen to see one of your posts has disappeared, it could be because Websleuths does not allow discussion of hoax theories or rumors from other sites, or for a violation of one of The Rules noted and linked above.

DO NOT discuss moderation on the thread. Mods have the right to edit and delete posts at their discretion if there is a violation of TOS or the post is otherwise deemed inappropriate.

If you need help or have questions or concerns, the Mods are happy to assist. Please use the private messaging system called “Conversations” to contact us in a respectful fashion. Disrespect to members or Websleuths staff is not allowed.

The above is only a partial list of TheRules aka TOS. You'll find others in the links provided. Please check them out, as it is every member’s responsibility to know them and post in accordance with them.

Sillybilly · Jan 22, 2021

Many posts (40+) have been removed due to discussion of an original post that was basically generalized bashing of LE and conjecture with no supporting information/facts.

Websleuths is fact based and primarily pro-LE. We rely on facts as we know them via approved sources (MSM articles, LE reports, public documents, scholarly articles).

Generalized bashing of law enforcement is not allowed at Websleuths. Please don't make accusations against LE or anyone based on nothing but conjecture or wild speculation.

IOW, we wouldn't allow accusations against a neighbor just because they live next door and could have done such and such. We don't allow accusations against LE just because they could have done such and such while they were there just doing their job.

The only exception in this regard would be, if throughout the judicial process a defence lawyer was to introduce the possibility of impropriety by LE, then it could be up for discussion.

Also, new members need to know, and veteran members need to remember to please post respectfully at all times without bickering, name calling, or personalizing toward other members. Address the post and not the poster.

Hope that clarifies. Any questions, please use the Report feature or private message a Mod or Admin to ask.

Thanks.

Thread is open again.

Tink56 · Feb 12, 2021

Was thinking this morning about AS's Appellate motion to remove the GPS tracking device. Judge Blawie said he was hesitant to do anything about removing it but would consider a wrist bracelet. AS said he was agreeable to that, but then he files the appeal anyway before finding out if there is wrist bracelet available or if newer batteries would allow for less frequent charging. Did Schoenhorn file the appeal before Judge Blawie ruled?

Then, I thought the ski season in Colorado must be winding down. Yep...below is the schedule for the remaining season. The first column in blue with X's indicates the event is open for U-19, U-21, Seniors and U-16 (MT's daughter's age group). The second column indicates U-16 events. The Rocky Mountain Championships are in March. So this would be only about 5 weeks for viewing deprivation of her daughter's events.

It appears MT wants the tracking gone...so she can ski herself (recreational as Judge Blawie noted), water ski (same notation), swim, etc. MT wants it off...NOW!

2021 RMD Race Calendar

jakat · Feb 12, 2021

MsJosie said:
We also don’t know if MT caused any other issues at the school in the past year or two, not related to the charges, that could have had the school ban her from graduation. Still don’t have this really confirmed that she was banned. It may be cleared up at trial.
I have wondered who is paying for tuition...looking at it as a bill. MT has no monies really coming in that we know of. Tuition may be paid by her ex. MT parents may be paying part of it. I don’t know where the divorce was, but each state has rules on how much alimony is given to a spouse and how long one souse pays another. Is MT living off the alimony, if she is still getting it.
I also am interested in MT producing any and all receipts of sales of her products.
With court dates coming back on the docket, MT will have to answer these questions plus more. MT does not want to answer any questions...get rid of the bracelet and leave the country and she won’t have to answer anything.
So many questions...and LE and MT and her team know the answers. She has to be really afraid.

She was receiving $4,000 a month child support, not sure if that included alimony or if she received any alimony at all. The girl's father was paying the school tuition. MT was living off of child support and JFd's money. Grrrr....

Jmoose · Feb 12, 2021

Tink56 said:
Was thinking this morning about AS's Appellate motion to remove the GPS tracking device. Judge Blawie said he was hesitant to do anything about removing it but would consider a wrist bracelet. AS said he was agreeable to that, but then he files the appeal anyway before finding out if there is wrist bracelet available or if newer batteries would allow for less frequent charging. Did Schoenhorn file the appeal before Judge Blawie ruled?

Then, I thought the ski season in Colorado must be winding down. Yep...below is the schedule for the remaining season. The first column in blue with X's indicates the event is open for U-19, U-21, Seniors and U-16 (MT's daughter's age group). The second column indicates U-16 events. The Rocky Mountain Championships are in March. So this would be only about 5 weeks for viewing deprivation of her daughter's events.

It appears MT wants the tracking gone...so she can ski herself (recreational as Judge Blawie noted), water ski (same notation), swim, etc. MT wants it off...NOW!

View attachment 283969
2021 RMD Race Calendar

Of course he filed it before Blawie ruled; he filed it before they went to court, because he knows what Blawie’s going to do-he’ll say “no”

Diddian · Feb 12, 2021

Jmoose said:
Of course he filed it before Blawie ruled; he filed it before they went to court, because he knows what Blawie’s going to do-he’ll say “no”

And rightfully so, with all due respect.

A defendant charged as a co-conspirator to abduct and murder has been lawfully charged with an exceptionally serious offense - against the victim as well as against all good citizens of the state of CT, despite this particular defendant and her attorney's behaving as though that is not so and as though she is a victim here.

Tink56 · Feb 12, 2021

Jmoose said:
Jennifer and MT absolutely met; that house wasn’t THAT big

We know from the financial trial in December 2018 that FD and MT plus her daughter were traveling together in 2015. I am assuming that they had a relationship before jetting off to resorts outside the U.S.

JFD's father died in January (?) 2017 and FD refused marital counseling, and JFD refused to live under the nifty "we can all live together" kids, paramour, and you idea in 4JX.

JFD had to literally escape the house because FD sent the movers away on 1 or 2 different occasions before she finally escaped in June 2017.

So how can MT possibly claim she didn't know or know of JFD. Is she going to claim that she didn't know about FD's idea that they all live together? Obviously, MT was going to support her daughter and her interests first. I doubt she planned to be a fulltime mother to the 5 other children, too. (How would she have moved to Colorado for the ski season, etc.)

The pre-knowledge of FD's murderous trip to New Canaan on the morning of May 24, 2018, is evident if you look at her movements, her lies, and her changing testimony.
MOO...IMO

Jmoose · Feb 12, 2021

I really, really want to know where everybody was going to sleep at 4JC? Was Jennifer going to have to sleep on the couch in the living room? Were some of her kids going to have to share a room so MT’s kid could have her own room? Was MT going to be the “lady of the house” that Jennifer paid the mortgage, utilities, insurance and taxes for?

Mimi in London · Feb 12, 2021

Jmoose said:
I really, really want to know where everybody was going to sleep at 4JC? Was Jennifer going to have to sleep on the couch in the living room? Were some of her kids going to have to share a room so MT’s kid could have her own room? Was MT going to be the “lady of the house” that Jennifer paid the mortgage, utilities, insurance and taxes for?

I have often wondered the same. There’s that photo of the windowless playroom in the basement of 4JX - I expect MT and FD thought Jennifer could spend her time there, watching the kids. And drop off MT’s kid at school, heck what’s one more on the school run when you have 5 already? MOO

citygirl · Feb 12, 2021

Morgan10028 said:
New video of "the other woman" in missing mom Jennifer Dulos case being grilled by cops - CBS News

The death of Fotis Dulos left Michelle Troconis in a precarious legal position, says her attorney, Jon Schoenhorn. "I think the right expression here is, 'she's left holding the bag.'" Authorities still plan on pursuing charges including conspiracy to commit murder against Troconis, leaving her facing the possibility of years in prison for the death of a woman she never met and whose body has never been found.

[...]

Late last year, Michelle Troconis, two of her sisters and her father met with "48 Hours" in Connecticut.

[...]

They say that when Michelle Troconis moved with her young daughter to Connecticut, she knew nothing about the difficulties in the Dulos marriage. Attorney Schoenhorn says Fotis lied to Michelle, telling her that the couple was amicably divorcing.

"Well, hindsight, of course, is 20/20, right?" Schoenhorn said. "...Had she even known about how contentious the relationship became between Jennifer and Fotis, she never would have moved up here." And Fotis Dulos didn't just lie to Michelle, says her family. He lied to all of them as well.

[...]

But what about the surveillance footage that appears to show Michelle inside Fotis Dulos' truck as he is discarding that incriminating trash on Albany Avenue in Hartford? Schoenhorn says he knows of no evidence that Michelle knew Jennifer Dulos was missing at that point or that she had any idea what was inside the black bags.

Schoenhorn says no physical evidence ties Michelle to any of the evidence recovered from that night and points to those police videos that, he says, show Michelle cooperating with police. "She not only did not know what was in those bags," says Schoenhorn, "...she told police this multiple times, she had no idea what he was actually doing."

But Connecticut investigators say Michelle Troconis changed her stories over the course of three interviews and they believe she knows more than what she is saying.

JS never disappoints. He should have said she was left holding several BLOODY bags with her DNA on them. What we know now.
How much more will LE reveal?
We have now learned that FD and MT were a couple since 2016. Maybe even 2015?
Did she live in one of his earlier houses in Avon? Biding her time before she could move into 4JX?
And we are to believe that she had NO clue about their caustic divorce?
Seriously?
And,on another link she claims to have never met Jennifer?
The Fore Group office was on the 3rd floor of the house!
Their paths never crossed?
Do you believe that?
I don't.
He implores us to believe she was completely clueless.
Erin Moriarty opines that she may have been blinded by love.
IMO, she was covetous of everything that belonged to Jennifer.
Her wealth, her marital bed, her deluxe shower, her husband, the whole ball of wax.
And, the family was all in.
MOO.

citygirl · Feb 12, 2021

CTGrammy said:
MT is Saying that she Never met JFd?

Really?

MT moved to CT in 2016 to 'work' (IMO, the oldest profession) with Fd in his Home Office at 4JC while JFd and the children Still Lived in the Home until June of 2017.

So, How is it, that MT Never met JFd?

Really?

MT was in JFd's Home only Feet from JFd, at least 5 days a week, and they Never met?

Really?

Fd and MT were seen All Over CT and especially in Avon and Farmington, carrying on an affair right in front of Everyone, Long Before JFd and the children fled in June 2017.

JFd confronted Fd and that is when he told JFd that the plan was for everyone to live as one big happy family on the weekends and school breaks with his Paramour and her child.

MT KNEW the Exact Family Dynamics and she Did Not Care.

IMO.

Missed this. Just posted similar sentiments.
You said it better.
MOO.

citygirl · Feb 12, 2021

Diddian said:
I am especially interested in that cellphone MT identifies as "Mami's" on MT's cellphone log (provided as an exhibit on one of MT's attorney's recent motions).

Why?

Because MT on her log is indicating that she was communicating with someone she identifies as "Mami" on the other end of that phone fairly continuously on 5/24 from 7:45am through 8:04am.

According to MT's cellphone log:
16 minute outgoing call from 7:45 to 8:01, then
5 sec outgoing call at 8:02, then
2 minute incoming call from 8:02-8:04

That was the exact time frame JFD was dropping the kids off at school the morning she disappeared, and shortly before JFD in her Suburban appears on a neighbor's surveillance returning to 69 Welles Lane. That last incoming call was ended 1 minute before the AW reports the Suburban showed on JFD's neighbor's surveillance.

I don't know about you, but when I consider the implications of that, I feel like I need to vomit.

And now MT's attorney is in court asking for the return of seized devices "belonging" to MT's mother and daughter without providing any helpful identifying information.

P.S. See SW for cell tower records in vicinity of Frogtown Rd from 7:45 to 8:20 am.

This is so unsettling.
I don't believe in coincidences.
Could it be?
MOO.

pernickety · Feb 12, 2021

Niner said:
Just wondering if there is yet a hearing date in April for the probate court?

TIA!

I can't answer your question, but yesterday in Superior Court there was a hearing in Hug's and Weinstein's cases against Pattis re his $250k retainer fee from FD. Per case detail it went ahead, and there's no notice of any future hearing.

citygirl · Feb 12, 2021

Tink56 said:
Was thinking this morning about AS's Appellate motion to remove the GPS tracking device. Judge Blawie said he was hesitant to do anything about removing it but would consider a wrist bracelet. AS said he was agreeable to that, but then he files the appeal anyway before finding out if there is wrist bracelet available or if newer batteries would allow for less frequent charging. Did Schoenhorn file the appeal before Judge Blawie ruled?

Then, I thought the ski season in Colorado must be winding down. Yep...below is the schedule for the remaining season. The first column in blue with X's indicates the event is open for U-19, U-21, Seniors and U-16 (MT's daughter's age group). The second column indicates U-16 events. The Rocky Mountain Championships are in March. So this would be only about 5 weeks for viewing deprivation of her daughter's events.

It appears MT wants the tracking gone...so she can ski herself (recreational as Judge Blawie noted), water ski (same notation), swim, etc. MT wants it off...NOW!

View attachment 283969
2021 RMD Race Calendar

But Tink, she has so many solid ties to the Farmington Valley.Lots of true friends and a job and numerous volunteer projects. One would think she is jonesing to get back.
MOO.

citygirl · Feb 12, 2021

Tink56 said:
We know from the financial trial in December 2018 that FD and MT plus her daughter were traveling together in 2015. I am assuming that they had a relationship before jetting off to resorts outside the U.S.

JFD's father died in January (?) 2017 and FD refused marital counseling, and JFD refused to live under the nifty "we can all live together" kids, paramour, and you idea in 4JX.

JFD had to literally escape the house because FD sent the movers away on 1 or 2 different occasions before she finally escaped in June 2017.

So how can MT possibly claim she didn't know or know of JFD. Is she going to claim that she didn't know about FD's idea that they all live together? Obviously, MT was going to support her daughter and her interests first. I doubt she planned to be a fulltime mother to the 5 other children, too. (How would she have moved to Colorado for the ski season, etc.)

The pre-knowledge of FD's murderous trip to New Canaan on the morning of May 24, 2018, is evident if you look at her movements, her lies, and her changing testimony.
MOO...IMO

I had forgotten about the movers.
They were interviewed and heart broken.
The husband actually cried.
What a little bit of a man was Mr. Fotis.
Couldn't hold a patch on the man that wanted to help his wife move.
A real man that shed tears for her.
MOO.

citygirl · Feb 12, 2021

Jmoose said:
I really, really want to know where everybody was going to sleep at 4JC? Was Jennifer going to have to sleep on the couch in the living room? Were some of her kids going to have to share a room so MT’s kid could have her own room? Was MT going to be the “lady of the house” that Jennifer paid the mortgage, utilities, insurance and taxes for?

And was her portrait gonna hang in the bedroom?

Jmoose · Feb 12, 2021

citygirl said:
And was her portrait gonna hang in the bedroom?

Of course-it was MT’s bedroom now

Seattle1 · Feb 12, 2021

Tink56 said:
Was thinking this morning about AS's Appellate motion to remove the GPS tracking device. Judge Blawie said he was hesitant to do anything about removing it but would consider a wrist bracelet. AS said he was agreeable to that, but then he files the appeal anyway before finding out if there is wrist bracelet available or if newer batteries would allow for less frequent charging. Did Schoenhorn file the appeal before Judge Blawie ruled?

^^rsbbm

Jmoose said:
Of course he filed it before Blawie ruled; he filed it before they went to court, because he knows what Blawie’s going to do-he’ll say “no”

JLS repetitive motions were stacked and ready-- regardless of the outcome of the last hearing where I really think Judge Blawie and Colangelo actually did MT a favor by initiating the idea to the defense where MT could possibly change the location of her monitoring device-- providing the technology was available to do so.

However, I also think JLS intentionally kept quiet here because he was simply going through the motions (i.e., he's seeking complete removal of GPS monitoring) so he could file in the appellate. (I can't wait to see it all backfire on JLS).

We've long known this was JLS's strategy since his first appearance before Judge Blawie where he came on strong against the non-financial bail conditions imposed against his client, and where Judge Blawie also reminded JLS of the alternative: his client could return to JAIL.

MOO

citygirl · Feb 12, 2021

Seattle1 said:
^^rsbbm

JLS repetitive motions were stacked and ready-- regardless of the outcome of the last hearing where I really think Judge Blawie and Colangelo actually did MT a favor by initiating the idea to the defense where MT could possibly change the location of her monitoring device-- providing the technology was available to do so.

However, I also think JLS intentionally kept quiet here because he was simply going through the motions (i.e., he's seeking complete removal of GPS monitoring) so he could file in the appellate. (I can't wait to see it all backfire on JLS).

We've long known this was JLS's strategy since his first appearance before Judge Blawie where he came on strong against the non-financial bail conditions imposed against his client, and where Judge Blawie also reminded JLS of the alternative: his client could return to JAIL.

MOO

How much longer do you think Blawie will maintain his cool?
Not well versed in the law but it seems he just keeps clogging up the system. Is this how it works?
Is this why the wheels of justice move slowly?
MOO.

Deceased/Not Found CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #53

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Administrator

MOO...IMO

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

MOO...IMO

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

DNASolves

Online statistics

Forum statistics

Deceased/Not Found CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 ARRESTS #53