Diddian’s post really interests me. I do think it may mean something
Some of them may have seen them. It depends on what their criteria for choosing jurors may be...like, will they only pick jurors who say they haven’t either heard of the case or read anything about it (as if there exists such a person in CT)? Ultimately, these images are irrelevant to the conspiracy case, but they are relevant to her portrayal of herself as a demure, spiritual, kind, sweet, never-hurt-a-fly, woman who only wanted to love a bad boy, and help raise his 5 children.
Here are a few breadcrumbs I’d like followed to help clear up that poor, naive, innocent portrayal:
1. Dates of marriage to Ex in Florida.
2. Dates of movements from last residences in FL
3. Whether she sold her last residence before moving to CT
4 Date she moved to CT
5. Location she directly moved into from FL
6 Date she moved into JXing
7 Dates of Ex’s car accident, and subsequent lawsuit and/or settlement.
8. Terms of FL support order from GB. (Peeps have referred to her monthly $4000 stipend as CS and possible alimony, but IIRC, she was never married to GB and this was only CS sought when child was 6 yrs old. I’d also like to compare dates of this motion with her dates of marriage to man she married in FL)
9. Given the claim of FD lying to the entire T clan, and considering the photos of cousins and families gleefully visiting MT at her new digs in fall, 2017 (previously openly posted on IG) and photos of the lavish Christmas/New Years 2017 party at JXing attended by members of the clan ( also previously openly posted on IG); I also think it would prudent to look at the dates of first motions requesting MT having no contact with Dulos children, and the dates of the orders prohibiting contact.
The Troconis family would have certainly realized FD had not been honest in his portrayal of an amicable divorce by some point in summer or fall in 2017, and the the morally superior family would have quickly correct course? MOO
IMO, their claims of being taken by FD are pure hogwash. Factual information, like the points listed above, will show objectively that their daughters decisions were calculated. IMO this factual information will show, that even if the family was blindsided, as they claim, that early into the relationship( between MT and FD), the truth of FDs and JFDs situation would have been known, any professed group holding tight to family values would have reacted differently.
Hard cold facts will expose MT as the hard cold conspirator she is-MOO MOO MOO