Still Missing CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #58

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, okay! So the ponchos came in at the clean up at Mountain Spring?
I suspect there was an intermediate scene - neither 69 Welles Ln nor 80 MS Rd. JFD's body left 69 Welles Ln at 10:25 am. FD in his own black Chevy Suburban and MT in the white Jeep arrive in tandem (him following her) at 80 MS Rd at 1:36 pm.

And MT cannot account for her own time after around 11:00 am-ish. On the activity log (LE called alibi script), MT indicates that after morning errands (photo with store robot, visit to return a purse to a friend) and visiting with a friend to say "bye" shortly after 11, she drove to the waterski pond but no one was there to pull her. Then she claims on that log that she was at 4JC from noon until 3:30, when she claims she took cleaning items to 80 MS Rd. Subsequently, she changed various times when talking to LE.
 
State enters two black gloves into evidence and now a second pair of black gloves because they appeared to have specks of blood on them. (He first said bloodlike, then blood.) Identifies bloodlike substance on the white logo and specks on multiple aspects of the gloves.
 
Witness IDs keys.

JS asks if the witness tried the keys into anything. Or if anyone did.

Objection.

Defense says they're not relevant.

State says everything in the trash is relevant, whether tested or not. Her offer of proof is that this is the item and it was seized.

Court is going to sustain the relevancy objection.
 
Witness IDs keys.

JS asks if the witness tried the keys into anything. Or if anyone did.

Objection.

Defense says they're not relevant.

State says everything in the trash is relevant, whether tested or not. Her offer of proof is that this is the item and it was seized.

Court is going to sustain the relevancy objection.
Not relevant?

A full set of keys in the same garbage bin as a number of bloody items recovered by officers in a missing person investigation with an already identified potential subject known to have dumped there?

Unbelievable.
 
Not relevant?

A full set of keys in the same garbage bin as a number of bloody items recovered by officers in a missing person investigation with an already identified potential subject known to have dumped there?

Unbelievable.
MOOMOOMOO

What is the Judge thinking? As the State indicated, everything in that trash is relevant. Did the Judge think that, since there's no testimony of bloodlike substances, the keys aren't relevant?

I'm stunned. They might prove MOST relevant! I hope they will come back in, via another witness.

MOOMOOMOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
102
Guests online
2,000
Total visitors
2,102

Forum statistics

Threads
601,607
Messages
18,126,758
Members
231,104
Latest member
maxnum
Back
Top