My bad! I found the copy. Go under the bloody fingerprint and there is a link near the bottom that had the report of Dr. Jantz findings. Here's a snippet that I found interesting:
"The latent print (bloody print) has a value of 12.6mm from core to flexion crease; Devon's value, 10.7, is nearly 2 mm less and Devon's (I assume this is typo and they meant Damon's) is over 3 mm less. The latent is most similar to the adult female mean but also has a probability of falling into adult male distribution. The combined adult male-female posterior probabilities are 0.925, leaving a probability of 0.075 that it falls into the children's distribution. That the print is a child cannot be ruled out, but based on this evidence it has a much lower probability than adult. Devon's print size has it's highest probability of falling into the children's distribution, but cannot reliably be distinguished from an adult female. It's probability with an adult male is low. Damon's right thumb can be identified as that of a child with a probability approaching 90%."
They gave James Cron a Loy of grief because he thought the print belonged to one of the boys, but he never stated that it definitely belonged to them AND he assumed this because the print was small. Darlie's hands are small.
Tell me what you think.
