Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Earlier on the news they said they expected to hear more about his relationships today?? So, don't know who they'd be hearing from. Surely not more mistresses?Who is on the list for today ? I have an expo to attend today as well as an order to finish and get out - maybe I'll just have to catch up later
I have just re-read the autopsy report and it sends shivers down my spine. It mortifies me that someone might be sitting in a cell of Arthur Gorrie knowing that he was responsible for this! The smart part of my brain tells me that death is death and so kinda insignificant if you have maggots eating you out, but what a tragic tragic end to the life of a beautiful person. One of the most worrying aspects of the autopsy was the total state of decomposition Allison was found in. The extent of decomposition could have masked so many dreadful inflictions of pain and injury. Dr Watson might be able to offer some commentary on how maggots might have targetted wound areas. I know that the husband is innocent until proven otherwise, but I really struggle to think that the perp of this crime can sit back and watch and let it happen. Does anyone have any thoughts on whether the perp intended for the victim to decompose beyond any good lab results?
Just posted this on the other thread
I'm still trawling through GBC's phone records - there's an awful lot to go through too - on the 5th April at 5.25 am his phone connected to the Internet at Fig Tree Pocket and stayed connected for eleven and a half hours
But a couple of sms made after 9am on that day originated from fortitude valley and valley central
And lots of calls on that day originated from all around - so it looks like the Fig Tree pocket Internet connection for Allison's phone doesn't mean it was in that area still for that whole time
Last edited by Maigret; Today at 06:49 AM. Reason: Extra
It was mentioned earlier that the judge would hear all the evidence before making his decision and that it was expected that it would go til tomorrow regardless. But there's been a lot said about how the judge must want to hear more because it's going on so long. Wondering which is right? If the judge was already convinced it needed to go to trial would he have already said so, or not?