I agree. But then the current government needs to work toward tightening up the Constitution, but is there even a hint that they are working in that direction? I hear crickets.
I think some of these Supreme Court rulings have caught legislators by surprise. In nearly 250 years as a country, there's never been this much of a problem dealing with a corrupt elected official, particularly a POTUS. Times certainly have changed. It's a laundry list of recent Supreme Court rulings that need to be reversed or changed, starting with describing the instances for criminal prosecution of a sitting POTUS. I've heard some experts say it can be further refined in lower court rulings. Others have issued a call for a Constitutional Amendment. Others in Congress have introduced a bill to impeach members of the Supreme Court.
![www.theguardian.com](/forums/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.guim.co.uk%2Fimg%2Fmedia%2Faed5d520bb76771a2d81366f7d68c228f0a21595%2F0_32_2880_1729%2Fmaster%2F2880.jpg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26height%3D630%26quality%3D85%26auto%3Dformat%26fit%3Dcrop%26overlay-align%3Dbottom%252Cleft%26overlay-width%3D100p%26overlay-base64%3DL2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc%26enable%3Dupscale%26s%3D5cce9aa75f21085a53a2aecf6430163b&hash=d484b0fa0576a5417521a1884a9a2d41&return_error=1)
House Democrat pledges amendment to reverse Trump immunity ruling
Congressman Joe Morelle vows to act in wake of supreme court decision – but plan is highly unlikely to succeed
Last edited: