DC - Savvas Savopoulos, family & Veralicia Figueroa murdered; Daron Wint Arrested #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
snipped



It think the "Amy is going out tonight" comment was part of an everyday conversation the two had when they were in person. That's how I originally took it. I'd like to see a friend or associate's of Amy's speak up and confirm s/he had plans with Amy that were canceled Wednesday night. I would think that if Amy were indeed going out (which seems to fit her social reputation), she would go out with someone and not alone. So, did that person receive a phone call or text from Amy to cancel or was the person stood up?

We only know this info because NG said the conversation happened. It's possible Amy had no plans to go out and NG concocted the story. At this point, I'm still believing NG but the schedule of her week is nagging at me.

I didn't think so before, but I now think SS saying Amy was in bed all day Wednesday is a clue, either for NG to be concerned or later for LE to figure out the happenings of the day. If he says Amy was in bed all day, maybe that's a clue to LE that any withdrawal from the bank on Wednesday was NOT by Amy. ???

I do not suspect SS and NG were having an affair.

JMO.
I thought what she said was that SS told her Amy was going out Wednesday (not Wednesday night), so that when he later said Amy had been home sick in bed all day, that struck her as strange because it was inconsistent with SS's earlier statement that she was going out Tuesday (daytime). MOO

Edited to add: like you, I took it as ordinary chit chat.
 
Every time I read NG my brain processes it as Nancy Grace. Grrrr

It took me days to snap out doing the same thing, lol! I got it down now....as long as Nancy Grace doesn't do a story on this case, we're good. ;)
 
It took me days to snap out doing the same thing, lol! I got it down now....as long as Nancy Grace doesn't do a story on this case, we're good. ;)

LOL I quit fighting it and just resigned myself to thinking the maid's name is Nancy Grace.
She is Nancy Grace to me. LOL
 
Couple reportedly told housekeeper not to come before being killed in DC mansion

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/05/1...eeper-not-to-visit-before-being-killed-in-dc/

On Wednesday night, Savvas Savopoulos left a voicemail for one of the housekeepers, saying she should not come in Thursday because his wife Amy was sick, ABC News reported Monday.

Savvas Savopoulos had told Gutierrez on Wednesday that his wife had plans to go out. But in the voicemail that night, he said Amy Savopoulos had been sick in bed, according to The Associated Press.

bbm

NG has thrown in a lot of irrelevant details in her narrative. Whether Amy had plans to go out or not on Wed. has nothing to do with the housekeeper's job.

JMO
 
I think he burned it to erase any possible evidence, but I also think he burned it because he's a jerk.

The perp "overkills" and burning the car fits the pattern of going overboard with the violence and destruction. I think he is destructive and cruel simply because he can be.

JMO

I really do agree with you. At one time if the murders were what is considered overkills and sadistic it was thought to have been done by someone known to the victims. That is no longer the case. It doesn't matter if the victims knew their murderer or not. Even strangers are doing heinous depraved overkills on victims they don't even know from rapes, to torture wanting the victims to suffer in immense pain before death.

And I agree with you on the reason its happening. They know the victims are at their mercy and these people, known to the victims or not, have no mercy at all. They do these horrible twisted things just because they can. Its really frightening to think about.

The mom/wife, Amy, was an attractive woman and I have even wondered if the perp or perps raped her repeatedly right in front of her husband and child? I know its a terrible thing to even think about but it sure has happened in other cases of home invasions.:(

IMO
 
I really do agree with you. At one time if the murders were what is considered overkills and sadistic it was thought to have been done by someone known to the victims. That is no longer the case. It doesn't matter if the victims knew their murderer or not. Even strangers are doing heinous depraved overkills on victims they don't even know from rapes, to torture wanting the victims to suffer in immense pain before death.

And I agree with you on the reason its happening. They know the victims are at their mercy and these people, known to the victims or not, have no mercy at all. They do these horrible twisted things just because they can. Its really frightening to think about.

The mom/wife, Amy, was an attractive woman and I have even wondered if the perp or perps raped her repeatedly right in front of her husband and child? I know its a terrible thing to even think about but it sure has happened in other cases of home invasions.:(

IMO

This case linked below is so similar and it has truly bothered me to this day. I think that is why this new case we are talking about has gripped me. It is so darn similar to this one.

I also learned something new about the previous case and cant believe what I just read. Grrrrrr. What kind of lousy policy is this? I sure hope other LE agencies dont follow this policy. This is crazy to me. They were outside waiting while the perps were in there torturing and killing his family. I know they didnt know that was happening but still. You have to assume bad things are happening in the house. What about storm the house?


" Police said they followed standard hostage procedure by not going in until the suspects fled. But Vignola admitted that no attempt was made even to contact the family.
"No phone call was made from any police officer to the home?" the defense asked him in court.
"That's correct," he responded. "


http://abcnews.go.com/US/911-call-images-depict-jennifer-hawke-petit-withdrawing/story?id=11648639
 
This case linked below is so similar and it has truly bothered me to this day. I think that is why this new case we are talking about has gripped me. It is so darn similar to this one.

I also learned something new about the previous case and cant believe what I just read. Grrrrrr. What kind of lousy policy is this? I sure hope other LE agencies dont follow this policy. This is crazy to me. They were outside waiting while the perps were in there torturing and killing his family. I know they didnt know that was happening but still. You have to assume bad things are happening in the house. What about storm the house?


" Police said they followed standard hostage procedure by not going in until the suspects fled. But Vignola admitted that no attempt was made even to contact the family.
"No phone call was made from any police officer to the home?" the defense asked him in court.
"That's correct," he responded. "


http://abcnews.go.com/US/911-call-images-depict-jennifer-hawke-petit-withdrawing/story?id=11648639

At least Jennifer took advantage of the opportunity to let the bank know the family was in danger. I have to wonder why SS was so vague and the only logical reason would be that he was told what to say.

JMO
 
Authorities could spend the next week or even longer...Lanier said tips are coming in as detectives painstakingly go through the house, with evidence collection challenged by the fire and the efforts by firefighters to put it out.”

That sounds pretty ominous to me. But Cathy's no dummy -- this could be deception as well.
 
NG has thrown in a lot of irrelevant details in her narrative. Whether Amy had plans to go out or not on Wed. has nothing to do with the housekeeper's job.

JMO

It's been puzzling why she's talking in the first place. Do folks get paid for these sort of appearances?
 
I wish news reporters would be precise in their language. For example, today we have read something that claims the victims were held hostage "till SS gave them what they wanted."

That implies that, in the end, they got something that SS was withholding from them all those hours.

Yet it seems SS was a puppet in their hands as he obeyed their wishes about who to call and what to say. Yet, we are led to believe that for all that time, he had the fortitude to withhold that "certain something" that would end the nightmare?????

If the police know what they wanted, they know why they came. That's a big deal. If they know they were successful, they know a lot more of the story at this point then currently revealed.

But then again, this could just be an assumption or a careless turn of phrase. Too much of that these days in journalism.
 
It's been puzzling why she's talking in the first place. Do folks get paid for these sort of appearances?

I doubt the news media is paying her a dime. She's attempting to portray herself as a potential victim rather than a suspect. Notice LE has refused to confirm anything she has said.

JMO
 
I doubt the news media is paying her a dime. She's attempting to portray herself as a potential victim rather than a suspect. Notice LE has refused to confirm anything she has said.

Yeah, so this kinda reaffirms my theory that she's involved in this somehow.
 
I wish news reporters would be precise in their language. For example, today we have read something that claims the victims were held hostage "till SS gave them what they wanted."

That implies that, in the end, they got something that SS was withholding from them all those hours.

Yet it seems SS was a puppet in their hands as he obeyed their wishes about who to call and what to say. Yet, we are led to believe that for all that time, he had the fortitude to withhold that "certain something" that would end the nightmare?????

If the police know what they wanted, they know why they came. That's a big deal. If they know they were successful, they know a lot more of the story at this point then currently revealed.

But then again, this could just be an assumption or a careless turn of phrase. Too much of that these days in journalism.

In the Clutter family murders of 50 years ago, the killers were told Mr. Clutter kept large sums of cash in a safe. That turned out to be untrue and they killed the family anyway. We'll probably never know what really went down unless the killer gives an allocution in exchange for a plea.

JMO
 
Somebody seemed to be really concerned about this other maid and wanted to make sure she didn't show up.

I think it was someone who knew her. I say looks for links between landscapers & maids
 
I wish news reporters would be precise in their language. For example, today we have read something that claims the victims were held hostage "till SS gave them what they wanted."

The reporting has been absolutely atrocious, in person and in print. It's fascinating how much different "gave them whatever they wanted" is from "gave them what they wanted". I firmly believe, at the time the statement was made, LEOs and reporters did not know what compelled the suspects to burn the place and depart.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
182
Guests online
362
Total visitors
544

Forum statistics

Threads
609,719
Messages
18,257,299
Members
234,736
Latest member
MelonSmasher
Back
Top