emmavoberry
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2008
- Messages
- 406
- Reaction score
- 0
"I still have some doubts though- lying to LE is not a good step to take, but I can still understand that maybe he was trying to somehow protect SS. Maybe he thought the $$ dropoff for SS was for something shady/illicit? IIRC, it took a little bit for official IDs of victims to come out. Maybe he was answering questions about the money dropoff without knowing for certain that SS had died in the fire? Just speculation of course... "
You are too kind. I, on the other hand, am less generous. He knew folks had died and there was a horrendous crime scene at stake IF he was there as they dragged bodies out. He knew one was a child. He did not know where SS was, did he? He is racing to the fire, having been contacted about it, and as some infer, about SS whereabouts, gets to an obvious scene of horror, is interrogated, and with no word from SS or AS ,despite his inquiries, does not yet realize what every one else had, that this was a "suspicious fire?"
And though I appreciate the idea that he might have wanted to "cover" for SS as in "could be an off-the-books transaction," that does not account for his particular lies or lapses. Why lie about what he witnessed at bank? Why lie about how he delivered? Why lie about the car being locked?! He must have known none of his lies could cover up for the fact that his boss had arranged for a cash pickup of a large amount of money as this was the very subject of the interview. (emboldened by moi)
I hate to think that anyone this family entrusted, this company via SS hired, the darling child's former coach, could betray them. I do think LE is contemplating that.
Did LE lead him into lies? That is another possible. They fixated on him, suspected him right off the bat, perhaps because they knew the ethnicity of a perpetrator or were unconsciously suspicious due to his ethnicity...
His continued silence is not good news. One would think he would defend himself against the media and public onslaught, have corrected the record which has been widely aired by this time, start his own documentation about LE harassing him and trapping him and refute the theories swirling about. I would do all in my power to stem this tide. I would not have to speak directly to the press or LE, but I would certainly get legal advice and an organization or legal entity to speak up for me.
As far as we know, nothing. Not a word. Not a representative to start putting the record straight. Not a lawyer. His father is or was LE!
Is he talking to LE as we talk about him and MSM releases in delay the SW and sensationalizes the "suspect" angle, grabbing at straws with a few early documents?
Something is going on behind closed doors and we are getting a mere glimpse in. What I see does not, thus far, bode well for JW in terms of his future. And is not MSM or LE afraid they will get the heck sued out of them?
JMO he is fishy to high heaven. LE knows it and is flushing him out or already has. IF NOT, hope he does get millions for this terrible blow to his credibility which is certain to have repercussions in his carefully constructed world where "you can't afford it, pal" is the motto.
You are too kind. I, on the other hand, am less generous. He knew folks had died and there was a horrendous crime scene at stake IF he was there as they dragged bodies out. He knew one was a child. He did not know where SS was, did he? He is racing to the fire, having been contacted about it, and as some infer, about SS whereabouts, gets to an obvious scene of horror, is interrogated, and with no word from SS or AS ,despite his inquiries, does not yet realize what every one else had, that this was a "suspicious fire?"
And though I appreciate the idea that he might have wanted to "cover" for SS as in "could be an off-the-books transaction," that does not account for his particular lies or lapses. Why lie about what he witnessed at bank? Why lie about how he delivered? Why lie about the car being locked?! He must have known none of his lies could cover up for the fact that his boss had arranged for a cash pickup of a large amount of money as this was the very subject of the interview. (emboldened by moi)
I hate to think that anyone this family entrusted, this company via SS hired, the darling child's former coach, could betray them. I do think LE is contemplating that.
Did LE lead him into lies? That is another possible. They fixated on him, suspected him right off the bat, perhaps because they knew the ethnicity of a perpetrator or were unconsciously suspicious due to his ethnicity...
His continued silence is not good news. One would think he would defend himself against the media and public onslaught, have corrected the record which has been widely aired by this time, start his own documentation about LE harassing him and trapping him and refute the theories swirling about. I would do all in my power to stem this tide. I would not have to speak directly to the press or LE, but I would certainly get legal advice and an organization or legal entity to speak up for me.
As far as we know, nothing. Not a word. Not a representative to start putting the record straight. Not a lawyer. His father is or was LE!
Is he talking to LE as we talk about him and MSM releases in delay the SW and sensationalizes the "suspect" angle, grabbing at straws with a few early documents?
Something is going on behind closed doors and we are getting a mere glimpse in. What I see does not, thus far, bode well for JW in terms of his future. And is not MSM or LE afraid they will get the heck sued out of them?
JMO he is fishy to high heaven. LE knows it and is flushing him out or already has. IF NOT, hope he does get millions for this terrible blow to his credibility which is certain to have repercussions in his carefully constructed world where "you can't afford it, pal" is the motto.