twomanywords
I know I meant to write toomanywords
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 593
- Reaction score
- 1
Are you suggesting that the smell of death was a pig?If you listen closely to what both JB and LKB are saying, they state that there is no reason to inspect the crime scene until the SA hands over the discovery photos, etc, so they can see what the area was like when they came onto the scene. They were also kept off there by it being private property. I heard LE saying they would have to get permission from the property owner.
Now, since they went onto the scene to inspect I would assume that the SA has finally handed over what they needed so they have some idea what it looked like before.
As for finding more potential evidence, if you read the latest docs you will see that Henry L did find evidence in the trunk, handed it over to LE and they proceeded to do another search and collection after they left finding many more pieces of evidence that they then correctly processed. There were a lot of hairs stuck to pop cans and other garbage. Those docs are where I see what I suspected or wondered about previously. Was there any remnants of pork in the trash? From what I have been able to gather it looks like pig could be confused for human decomp. there were packages from both ham and cheese in there. If it were in the trunk for at least 2 weeks the maggots could easily have ingested any solid material that started out in the trash. But I'm sure the entomological tests will show what they ingested.
Rotten ham?
I would think that cadaver dogs are trained to tell the difference between human and porcine remains.