Her behavior is so key. I recently heard parts of that first interview with LE and couldn't believe that she sounded so unemotional. I remember the first time I heard it I thought...well, maybe she sounds so casual because there was no way of knowing if Caylee was alive or dead. Now, knowing that Caylee is dead I am chilled by her lack of emotion, detachment even. She was more concerned about her being arrested "on a whim" then "finding" her own child. She is one heartless b*tch
Even if the jury doesn't believe the forensics....a juror will have to reconcile the following:
1. Mother doesn't report her child missing for 31 days
2. Mother parties while child is missing
3. Mother steals from many individuals and to what knowledge we've gained, nothing was purchased for said missing child, and she certainly wasn't using said money to search for said missing child
4. Abandons smelly car
5. Strange searches on computer
6. Lies about job, friends, NANNY, life, parents, schooling, and on and on and on...even in the face of contradictory evidence. (i.e investigators taking her to Universal)
7. Says child was taken by a nanny. A nanny NO ONE (not the grandmother, grandfather, uncle, numerous ex-boyfriends, friends, relatives, school mates) have ever seen. EVER. There is no phone number for nanny, and all of the references to do with nanny have been proven to be interwoven in other lies. (i.e. RM across the street from "Gloria", etc.)
This will be her undoing, because I don't care who is on the jury...taken one lie at a time, no jury will be able to take it all and say "I still don't think she did it." It starts with the 31 days...that is the HARDEST to reconcile. This mother is not worried about her baby. No tears, no pleas, nothing. That is bad enough. Then just keep adding it on.
To be honest, I really don't even think they need the forensics.