Wow! What a theory. I have no respect for either CA or GA, but I would never consider that CA killed Caylee and hid her body in the trunk of KC's car and then let her drive around with the body for weeks.
Someone else posted on a thread that's since been closed that "good Southern values' would have had them "eating my teeth for dinner" if they had ever talked back to their
own parents (step-parents).
Wow! I don't mean to sound argumentative, but when someone says "I would have been eating my teeth for dinner", and then goes on to say "good Southern values are hard lessons, but well worth it"?
To me this perpetuates the idea that physically "knocking some sense" into children is the way to effectively provide 'good parenting'.
My family is from the south and I've never heard of 'good Southern values' = knocking a kids teeth down their throat to eat for dinner.
Sorry. I just find that scary and not something that effectively teaches any child good values.
The Anthonys missed the boat when it came to good parenting to be sure. But I would never venture to say that any parent should knock a kid's teeth down their throat to eat for dinner.
I also can't imagine CA killing Caylee and then putting the body in KC's car for KC to drive around with for weeks. Furthermore, it makes no sense to suggest that the two of them acted together to kill Caylee and then go on to say that CA put the child's body into the trunk without KC knowing it.
Is it just me or do some people here grasp for straws in an attempt to explain what most of us will never be able to comprehend? Even so, for someone to suggest that CA killed Caylee (with or without KC's help) and then hid the body in KC's trunk is just unimaginable to me.
That 'theory' is just so out of bounds that I was taken aback when I read someone posting that it might be possible.
JMO.