Steve Thomas must have seen the photos from the White's party. Anyone privy to that information already knows whether the white Gap shirt was part of the redressing/staging or not. I don't suppose the public will ever know, as the full extent of evidence won't be made public as long as the case remains "open". (as if).
It's the same with the autopsy report. Public documents that have information hidden or redacted are supposed to indicate that fact by showing where things are blacked out, or by indicating where things are supposed to be. The autopsy doesn't indicate anything was edited, but there were so many irregularities in the way the coroner worked, that I don't think it can be assumed the report is complete the way we see it. In all the interviews, each line is numbered. There are many, many numbered lines with nothing written. There is a lot of info we don't have!
DeeDee249,
Steve Thomas did view the photos, he states this clearly in his book. This is how he knew Patsy was wearing the same clothes to the White's and the following morning!
A careful reading of his book will suggest he is privy to more forensic evidence than has been released publicly e.g. JonBenet's vaginal status was discussed in his book, and a conclusion of prior molestation is reached, Coroner Meyer indirectly refers to this verbally, which is distinct from her acute vaginal injury, the Ramsey households were searched explicitly for child *advertiser censored*, why so, I reckon the investigators had discovered a collection of photographs, the subject of which was JonBenet, so they speculated more should exist?
There is indeed information redacted from the autopsy, this is standard practise, it should be assumed in most homicides, since differentiating characters like J M Karr, who claim to be an offender, can be achieved employing some of the redacted information, and in staged crimes not advertising this fact can wrong foot an offender under interview.
The two largely uncontensted fallacies surrounding the death of JonBenet is that of an Intruder and an Accident, both do not explain the forensic evidence, and in fact simply complicate matters.
The death of JonBenet is a Lust Murder or a Sexual Homicide the investigating officers know this, they know who should have been charged, they have the evidence to substantiate probable cause, but political considerations determined otherwise.
.