I have no doubt it was a murder. Yes. I think the evidence was there. Computer searches for chloroform(sp?) and other inuries,The way I saw this is as no premeditation hardcore evidence; her boyfriend DID without a doubt have it on his myspace page! That is a reasonable explanation. There was also debate about the amount of times it was actually search. The cryptic searches like neck breaking could of been done with her self defense search or had something to do with the self defense search.. which would then make more sense to to why neck breaking was looked up the duck tape accross the mouth,A gain to me this was one of the worst pieces of evidence and here's why: the meter reader literally moved the bag with the meter stick! Casey's DNA was not on the tape atll, but another DNA profile was though, then the Anthony's claimed they wrapped their dead pets with duck-tape at the end the lies about the nanny, dumping the body in the woods, the 31 days in which she exhibited nothing remotely connected to grief or loss,She lied but this does not prove anything. Who knows the range of reactions after a death of a loved child, especially from a family that are all liars and constantly cover up tragedies. Can someone prove that this is not some kind of denial, brink of psychosis, The girl was already lying before this tragedy. How do I know other lying Anthony's weren't involved. the canine search hits, expereinced people who have smelled decomposition and their testimony and KC was the last one with Caylee. Yes, the dog searches I have to admit were weird, but it only proves there was a dead caylee in the backyard and possibly the trunk. Others didn't smell it, and why didn't an officer report the smell of death??And I don't not beleive for one minute GA would dispose of that child that way no matter what.but evidence didn't prove that he didn't! He allegedly lied about the affair IMO I do not know if KC got up that day and said, I will kill my child. But I think she had been planning it on some level. I believe she was angry that day and frustrated that she had to care for her daughter and took it out on her.Doesn't matter what people think; it matters what evidence proves
Now here is my sticky Q. If you heard all that information and the defendant had been an obese, unatractive woman would the jury have convicted her? I think they bought into her youth and beauty and that she just could not possibly have been so diabolical. By the way, my feelings are not based on hate, they are based on the evidenced as I saw it. JMO