*Lash*
Justice 4 Rebecca
- Joined
- May 11, 2012
- Messages
- 3,003
- Reaction score
- 67
@Lash-Respectfully, Dr. Melineck did not state that Dr. Lucas left the fracture out of the report.
Page 20-"Microscopic examination of his cervical cord byLawrence A. Hansen, M.D., a neuropathologist, also revealed what was described as cervical spinal cord-Acute hemorrhagic necrosis consistent with contusion. Apparently based on this
finding and the presence of the frontal bone fracture, the deputy medical examiner,
Jonathan Lucas, M.D., described Maxfield Shacknai as sustaining a high spinal cord injury due
to hyperextension."
The actual fracture is not a new find. In my opinion, they are not stating it is a new find. However, if the fall was a vertex presentation, and not a face presentation, it is not possible for the spinal injury to be due to extension/hyperextension of the neck.
Hi Jessica! I agree Melinek is not suggesting the vertex fracture is a new find. I believe attorney Hallier was postulating this to be a new find during this particular interview. I may be wrong, it is purely how it came across to me.