* Closed, locked door.
* Zero threat.
* A “noise” magically morphs into an “attack”.
* A trained, certified gun owner “doesn’t have time to think”.
* Said gun owner never intends to shoot but pulls the trigger four times with ultra-lethal Black Talons by “accident”.
The total illogic of OP’s story, the ‘perfect storm’ implausibility, the sheer impossibility of his version cannot be overstated.
OP commands that the silent, invisible “intruder” “Get the f##k out of my house!”*.
But what does he do next?
He instantly
prevents the very action he demands! He preemptively executes the silent, invisible, non-threatening “intruder”. 100% illogical - unless you’re OP. On his version, he could not allow that door to open - Reeva’s appearance would have killed his dark fairytale vibe.
Sounds like 100% murder to me.
Oscar himself
ADMITS he had no reason to shoot!
pg 309
Nel: We know for a fact that she was not a threat.
OP: That is correct, M'Lady.
Nel: We know for a fact you had no reason to shoot.
OP: That is correct.
One assumes that “no reason” means exactly that. Were it otherwise, he would have said no, I shot in self-defense.
If Reeva was no threat - the “intruder” was no threat.
Without any threat or attack (real or imminent), how does PPD stand as a credible defense?
This crucial legal element is entirely missing in his version.
One cannot lawfully kill in self-defense based on (alleged) “fear” alone. (Wouldn’t we all turn into killers? LOL)
Attack is the test ... not fear.
Yet Masipa bizarrely acquits him of murder.
“Errors” in factual findings naturally (and oh so conveniently) lead to wrong conclusions, wrong questions, gross errors in law and manifestly unjust verdicts - as this case spectacularly illustrates.
This is where the SCA will nail Masipa and convict Oscar of murder.
They
MUST - otherwise the social and legal landscape will become an even more murderous Wild West.
“Fear” is now the ultimate defense to murder.
Every defense attorney will simply cite
State v Pistorius.
* I have no doubt OP did indeed scream those exact words - to Reeva. He did indeed perceive “danger”, a “threat” (to his career, lifestyle, image, ego) - Reeva. He’s the worst, most calculating kind of sociopathic liar - he incorporates every bit of truth possible into his lies without compromising his false “version”. Voila - Truth and Lies become one. Turn on the endless, dramatic “remorse” and even he believes his own story.
