Thank you for the considered response. What I was referring to was a comment by you (IIRC) to another poster that wishing public shunning of OP (or something similar to that) showed more about them than him. My take is that also applies to those who take delight in the verdict, light sentence and early release. They care more that their `hero` gets out of prison after a ridiculously short period of time more than that a young woman is dead at his hands.
Re the evidence, I followed the trial closely and firmly believed it showed that he knew who was behind that door and deliberately shot to kill. And, even if he didn`t know it was her, he believed, on his own admission, that there was a human being in there and went ahead and fired four rounds of high calibre ammunition into a tiny cubicle. So IMO the evidence shows that at the very least he is guilty of Dolus eventualis. If you are concerned about evidence rather than emotion, may I pose two questions to you: Do you believe his story about being shot at on the freeway when he couldn`t recall who took him back the next day to retrieve his car and Do you agree with the judge finding him not guilty on the ammunition possession charge? TIA.
