Because it has the word 'LOVE' burnt into it from the tip of a red-hot fire poker.Then why, oh why, do you have a wooden spoon? :biggrin:
I don't think she'll get far with IAC, but she may hit pay dirt with OAC*ITA. But a girl can dream. Its always IAC isn't it? I'm sure that will be theme or that there was evidence that they didn't include or that she had to represent herself to get (*advertiser censored*) something along those lines. But.. I still giggle thinking of the crazyness that hasn't even begun.
Quote Originally Posted by LambChop View Post
But, but, but....it's only a teaspoon. Did I mention that?
Does it have sugar on it?
Not significant enough to hire an appellate lawyer for a death penalty appeal. Maybe for the guilt conviction, though, assuming she hasn't already spent half of it on candy.
ETA: It would still be a discount, "friends and family" sort of rate lol.
Yep. In the Jodifesto she doesn't mention the oral sex after Travis gives her the Book of Mormon at Starbucks. It was simply a sweet conversation and Napoleon was there on his leash.
Nor is there any sex after her baptism. She says it was a very great day for her
It's obvious she added the sex to these events that would be sacred to Travis. To hurt his reputation and to hurt his family. And to punish them for not pressing Juan to accept her plea to 2nd degree
It's still there, but she's cleaning it up. She unfollowed everyone she was following and removed everyone who was following her. She's probably furiously deleting old DMs too.
Weird. These pages are no longer available.
I stand by my belief that the actual sexual interaction between them was minimal, notwithstanding the heavy petting/grinding that is more reminiscent of my teen years than my late twenties, and that after all the effort to gain back his TR after finally getting rid of her, there's no way he just let her in for some "playtime" that last day. I don't even think he was the one on the pc at 4:34am or whatever time that was, that youtube video was a favourite of one of JA's male friends and he had posted it on his chat(myspace iirc) that she frequented, telling everyone to check it out about a week or so before the murder .... anyway, old stuff now that makes no difference, but as much as some believe JA was TA's kryptonite and he had no defense against her, I believe his faith was stronger, especially after having had some time and distance between them.
Wow! This video is eye-opening for me. You can hear and see in your mind's eye how Jodi has already hooked her talons into Travis' heart and soul. The manipulation has already begun.
His own words also reveal his conflicted feelings regarding Deanna. Which makes me wonder if those feelings were true, or just due to manipulations; a side-effect of the drug he was addicted to, aka Jodi Arias.
Travis Alexander 5/26 g chat, "Tell me the truth: I hate you. Say it. I want the truth just once and then tell me why you hate me and desire to destroy my life. Why did you manipulate me into loving you? I was a good guy. Why did you have to do it to me? ...What was your objective? What was the point?...Even now you only talk but your actions show that you hate me
View attachment 71335
Travisalexanderjustice.com/pic
I stand by my belief that the actual sexual interaction between them was minimal, notwithstanding the heavy petting/grinding that is more reminiscent of my teen years than my late twenties, and that after all the effort to gain back his TR after finally getting rid of her, there's no way he just let her in for some "playtime" that last day. I don't even think he was the one on the pc at 4:34am or whatever time that was, that youtube video was a favourite of one of JA's male friends and he had posted it on his chat(myspace iirc) that she frequented, telling everyone to check it out about a week or so before the murder .... anyway, old stuff now that makes no difference, but as much as some believe JA was TA's kryptonite and he had no defense against her, I believe his faith was stronger, especially after having had some time and distance between them.
First objection I hear is "objection, mischaracterizes her testimony," which means that Nurmi thinks Juan is claiming Dr. F said something she didn't really say.
ETA: This objection is generally used to signal the witness to say "that's not exactly what I said."
Dr. F sounded like a parrot every time Nurmi objected. She would repeat verbatim what the objection was and then start to explain what she testified to instead of just saying "I believe I said....." Dr. F did not remember a lot, only what defense wanted her to say which had to be obvious to the jury.
Yeah, I remember reading or hearing that as well. I'll see if I can find the msm article. Again, imo her and ALV both seemed to have same vocal intonations as well as rhythm.One would think... but iirc the foreman stated in his interview that Dr. F came off as credible. :sigh:
One would think... but iirc the foreman stated in his interview that Dr. F came off as credible. :sigh:
I kinda knew after the first hour or so and reflecting on even though how much i personally wanted it to be true. i couldn't trust the source and saw this cookie crumbling all day. I hope this is the end of CBs private investigator role and goes back to blogging about relationship advice. Its sensationalism and i have seen her levy some disturbing accusations at undeserving people. Enough.
I have seen CB being very accurate.