Hoosen_Fenger
Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2014
- Messages
- 180
- Reaction score
- 5
.... Please be gentle - I have only just joined Web Sleuths and this is my first post.
What is clear, is that there is a great deal of difficulty on deciding whether or not the Prosecution has proved its case. This is because the only living witness to the events leading up to Reeva's death, is being asked to give an account of them, which if it does not exonerate him, will lead to incarceration.
I do have a slightly different perspective on the question of the prosecution proving its case. Has anyone else considered the notion that Nel is making defence witness testimony, actually support the States case?
The prosecution has been hampered by its reliance on Pistorius being the only witness to the events leading up to Reeva being shot & killed. That Nel is rattling people who have clearly been coached to act for the defence, is testament to his skill.
As for an answer on whether the Prosecution has done enough? I would argue yes, with the proviso that there are many things not straightforward in this case.
What is clear, is that there is a great deal of difficulty on deciding whether or not the Prosecution has proved its case. This is because the only living witness to the events leading up to Reeva's death, is being asked to give an account of them, which if it does not exonerate him, will lead to incarceration.
I do have a slightly different perspective on the question of the prosecution proving its case. Has anyone else considered the notion that Nel is making defence witness testimony, actually support the States case?
The prosecution has been hampered by its reliance on Pistorius being the only witness to the events leading up to Reeva being shot & killed. That Nel is rattling people who have clearly been coached to act for the defence, is testament to his skill.
As for an answer on whether the Prosecution has done enough? I would argue yes, with the proviso that there are many things not straightforward in this case.