What did you do to confirm that the person called in giving Grammy permisson was the parent with authority to do so? I've had to do this with my kids in pre-school and was grateful that they took my word over the phone. But if you're worried about abuse, nothing short of photo i.d. and signatures of permitted persons, confirmed by the authorizing person, and the authorized person, in person, at the time of the authorization and the pick up will do. And this NEVER happens. And that's fine with me.
I am not the original poster, but I was an emergency "pick-up person" for a friend of mine whose child was in a local elementary school. Each child had a folder (probably on computer, too!) and when parents called in to inform the school that someone else would be picking up their child, they had to use a "code" word. My friends code word was "housefly" which I thought was hilarious, but it truly was a word that would have been hard for someone else to guess! That school also had a policy of having xeroxed copies of driver's licenses of anyone who would be picking up the child. Both things were required: If the code word was not given OR if a copy of the DL wasn't in the file, the child was not released.
The school had my DL pic on hand, and they did have the pic out to compare! I was very, very impressed!
nor would it make a difference about what happened to him.
Cameras may well have made a difference. If, as on my local high-school campus, signs are strategically placed informing the students, staff and public that they are being filmed, then Terri (or whoever took Kyron) might have decided not to attempt to pull this off on school grounds. Of course, Kyron may have been abducted from other locations, but cameras would have been a simple security device to protect the school and the students.
At the very least, LE could have identified the person who took Kyron very early on and recovered him quickly.
This is why I firmly believe had there of been a camera or two in this school that day there would be no confusion on how Kyron left the school that morning. Meaning, the school wouldn't have to deal with any speculation on who took the child. Oh, and it would also probably help reduce many of the stress the students/parents have about dropping their children off at the schools in this area. Even though they say "there is no evidence to say this will happen again" doesn't mean that perps don't see the faults these schools have and want to take advantage of that. Kyrons case, this entire situation, shouldn't be vain. Time for the school to take action, IMO.
I totally agree.
It seems like Kaine Horman might indeed be looking into the possibility of culpability of the school. His curious language regarding security, not his wife, being the problem points to that, anyway. IMO.
I don't find his language to be curious, because as a parent, he had every right to expect the school to have adequate security to protect his son from danger. I really don't think it matters what direction danger came from, if Kyron was taken from school grounds without any security in place to protect him, then the school is liable. And it is just common sense, at least in my opinion, to point out that the lack of security had a play in this case.