I tried to take some notes as I watched Dr. Phil's 'impromptu' episode. I quit about half-way through because I was just disgusted but I intend to finish watching it eventually.
- How rich that Dr. Phil goes on a media tour to tell the world that Burke's affect is "atypical" and his smiling at inappropriate times will interest people greatly then acts like anyone who thinks there's anything the slightest bit odd about it is stupid. He also says that he doesn't find Burke's "nervous smiling" weird because he's spent months getting to know Burke.
a) What? Months?
b) After all that time together, Burke still isn't comfortable enough talking to Dr. Phil to not smile nervously the entire time?
- Burke makes the statement that he wants people to focus on finding "the real killer" instead of making up "bogus" theories about him and his parents.
- I'm still confused about when this was filmed. Dr. Phil even seems to present it as something that was just thrown together after the specials were so popular, which logistically makes no sense. He also throws in some questions asked on Facebook. Was that from the Q&A from the other day, or did he have people ask questions on Facebook a while ago?
- Ooh, still trying to sell the basement window as an entry point! Now my blood is boiling because it's just stupid. Both Phil and Katie Couric (in the Lou Smit clip) make it sound like the reason the BPD discounted the window was because a person "couldn't get in there." DP says with a laugh that we just watched a 60-year-old man slide right in. No mention of the spider web, aka the real reason the BPD thought no one came through that window. Whatever, they might as well milk it for now. CBS has that spider web covered.
- lol, now he's bragging about what a "hard-edged" interrogator he is and says people asked why he didn't "crossexamine" Burke. DP repeats for the thousandth time that Burke wasn't a suspect, that's why. I'd suggest a drinking game where you drink every time DP says BR was never a suspect, but 13 minutes in and I'm already afraid I'd die of alcohol poisoning. He says Burke's answers are short because he doesn't know much and his memory has decayed.
- He points out LW was present for JR's interview, but only because he was interviewing both of them about the same thing; JR didn't request it.
- DP's explanation of the DNA is so muddled I'm not even going to bother. It's about 16 minutes in though. He says something about how the police got the "exonerating" DNA evidence within two weeks (of the murder?) but didn't give it to the DA's office for 7 months. Then he skips ahead to Lin Wood writing a letter to Mary Lacy, them having a "secret meeting" where she told him she agreed the Ramseys "had been targeted by the Boulder DA an it was getting out of control. This led to an -unprecedented- act." Then there's a clip of JR saying the 2 weeks thing, and LW saying he told Lacy that he would sue the city of Boulder if the case wasn't transferred to a "third party, objective, competent law enforcement agency". How does the BDA fit that bill?
DP asks LW and JR if JR has been "scientifically" exonerated and LW says, Yes.
Aaaaand that was when I couldn't take it anymore.