Dylan did not climb to the top of Middle Mountain and kill himself using blunt force trauma.
I’m playing devil’s advocate here. Could the blunt force trauma have been caused by a fall? (And then scavengers dragged parts of his body around? )
Dylan did not climb to the top of Middle Mountain and kill himself using blunt force trauma.
I’m playing devil’s advocate here. Could the blunt force trauma have been caused by a fall? (And then scavengers dragged parts of his body around? )
I’m playing devil’s advocate here. Could the blunt force trauma have been caused by a fall? (And then scavengers dragged parts of his body around? )
If he walked to the top of the mountain, then fell. I don't believe that he did. He was put up on that mountain after he was dead by his father, who killed him. It was caused by being struck with an object. (IMO, of course!)
IDK---but the main problem is that there is no reason that Dylan would have been up hiking alone in that remote area.
He was so excited about coming to see his old friends. He had 3 very good school friends that he had grown up with and he missed them, after he moved away with his Mom. He had been texting back and forth for weeks, excited about his visit.
They were all waiting for him in town. No way he would have ditched them and gone by himself up a hiking trail.
He had fought with his Dad the night before he went missing, because he wanted to go sleep over at his friends house. But his Dad said NO, he had to wait and see them the next morning. And then Dylan went mysteriously missing before he could even talk to his friends the next morning.
In fact, his communication with his friends stopped cold the night before, inexplicably.
So that is the long, rambling way to say 'NO, he did not fall down and hurt his head while hiking up the mountain. '
I believe that you’re right. But....trying to explore what the defense attorney will say. Of course, the jury would have to believe that he walked to the top of the mountain on his own. Depending on his habits, that might not be a credible claim.
True, they will try to sell that story. That is what Dylan's drunken father has tried to sell all along. That his son got up, didn't reply to all the messages from his friends, and instead walked up a steep cliff by himself. Well, originally he said that Dylan got up, ignored calls from friends offering him a ride to town, and instead tried hitchhiking, and then he was kidnapped.
But his story changed after the remains were found, then he said Dylan must have gone up the mountain by himself.
Right, katydid! That was AFTER he went fishing in Vallecito Lake with that missing fishing pole. (Yeah, right, MR -- he's got a million "stories"!)
The biggest problem for Mark Redwine's defense is that Dylan's blood was found inside his home.I’m playing devil’s advocate here. Could the blunt force trauma have been caused by a fall? (And then scavengers dragged parts of his body around? )
As they searched for evidence into the disappearance and death of the teenage boy, investigators found his blood in multiple locations inside his father’s home, including a couch, the corner of a coffee table, on the floor beneath a rug and on a love seat.
Yes, of course, how could I forget that mysterious missing fishing pole.
Also, we were expected to believe that MR offered Dylan a ride to his friend's house early that morning, but Dylan said no, Because he didn't want to get up. Ok, maybe...but then Dylan never called or texted his friends, nor replied to them when they called him?
And no evidence that Dylan called his dad that morning to ask him when he was returning?
We are supposed to believe that Dylan just spontaneously decided to walk up the mountain that morning. And bailed on his best friends.
The biggest problem for Mark Redwine's defense is that Dylan's blood was found inside his home.
The defense can try to exclude or mitigate the HRD dog alerts but how are they going to explain the blood evidence?
They may try to claim that all of that blood was from an earlier visit. Without anyway to prove that claim I'm not sure if a jury will buy it. Way to convenient.
The only hope that MR has is during jury selection. He will have to get at least one juror who dislikes LE and at the same time is sympathetic to him and hope for an acquittal or a hung jury.
It's happened in other cases but I seriously doubt it will happen in this one. JMO
Dylan Redwine: Docs. detail gruesome evidence
IDK---but the main problem is that there is no reason that Dylan would have been up hiking alone in that remote area.
He was so excited about coming to see his old friends. He had 3 very good school friends that he had grown up with and he missed them, after he moved away with his Mom. He had been texting back and forth for weeks, excited about his visit.
They were all waiting for him in town. No way he would have ditched them and gone by himself up a hiking trail.
He had fought with his Dad the night before he went missing, because he wanted to go sleep over at his friends house. But his Dad said NO, he had to wait and see them the next morning. And then Dylan went mysteriously missing before he could even talk to his friends the next morning.
In fact, his communication with his friends stopped cold the night before, inexplicably.
So that is the long, rambling way to say 'NO, he did not fall down and hurt his head while hiking up the mountain. '
EXACTLY. He planned on getting dropped off by his Dad before his dad had to go to town.BBM^
I recall Dylan was so desperate to get out of his dad's house that he made his buddy promise to leave the sliding glass door open/unlocked so he could enter the house without delay or disruption. He planned and/or expected to arrive very early in the morning.
MOO
Yes.EXACTLY. He planned on getting dropped off by his Dad before his dad had to go to town.
If Dylan was tired he could have gone back to sleep at his friends because his friend already said he'd still be sleeping that morning.
I don't believe for a minute that Dylan refused a ride to his friends that morning.