It's called being negligent and if someone's negligence killed your loved one a major lawsuit might keep it from happening again to others
Oh, ok.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's called being negligent and if someone's negligence killed your loved one a major lawsuit might keep it from happening again to others
Whilst the maximum incubation period for Ebola is three weeks, closing borders for 3 weeks cannot guarantee that the outbreak is over because the disease will still be spreading within the affected countries.
For that approach to work, the borders would have to be shut until three weeks after the last documented person or people had had contact with Ebola and remained disease free - until we get the outbreak under control, that might as well be forever.
Closing borders without tackling the outbreak on the ground in the three affected countries with a massive response seems very unlikely to work because until we do that, there is nothing to suggest that people will stop getting infected.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/06/health/ebola-liberia/index.html
this is very interesting..........I do not know if it has been posted.
Thank you.
I don't think this particular article has been posted.
I kind of hope that people might read it and cut Mr Duncan some slack. I do not believe he is a bad man and I don't think his coming to the US was a devious plan - the dates just don't add up.
But some of the nation's top infectious disease experts worry that this deadly virus could mutate and be transmitted just by a cough or a sneeze.
"It's the single greatest concern I've ever had in my 40-year public health career," said Dr. Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. "I can't imagine anything in my career -- and this includes HIV -- that would be more devastating to the world than a respiratory transmissible Ebola virus."
Osterholm and other experts couldn't think of another virus that has made the transition from non-airborne to airborne in humans. They say the chances are relatively small that Ebola will make that jump. But as the virus spreads, they warned, the likelihood increases.
Every time a new person gets Ebola, the virus gets another chance to mutate and develop new capabilities. Osterholm calls it "genetic roulette."
I agree to an extent but then why does Liberia plan to prosecute for lying on his airport forms?
I think that was a kneejerk reaction to be honest. They felt it made Liberia look bad.
Everyone wants someone to blame.
The situation in Liberia is appalling. The authorities there may well feel that a scenario where a seriously ill pregnant woman is given a wrong diagnosis, turned away from several medical facilities and basically left to die does not reflect on them too well. Add to that, the failure to diagnose her condition at any point and the resultant transmission of the infection to a significant number of neighbours and family members, several of whom are now dead - far better to deflect any accusations of inadequate and appalling care against them by accusing Mr Duncan of lying on his form.
That is my take on things.
JMOO
Thank you.
I don't think this particular article has been posted.
I kind of hope that people might read it and cut Mr Duncan some slack. I do not believe he is a bad man and I don't think his coming to the US was a devious plan - the dates just don't add up.
That makes sense.. I also think they have way more problems to deal with right now to worry at prosecuting Duncan.. He's most likely not going to make it... If he started having symptoms on the 25 or 26 and the folks in Liberia took 10 days before they died or got symptoms I'd say we should be getting to the ten day mark with his family here in the US this week.. Give or take a few days.
He gets ZERO slack. He lied.
I want to agree with you. He lied and he should not have. It's hard to be sympathetic. But as humans, we are to have compassion. Can I put myself in his shoes? I'm not condoning the lie. I would never condone the lie !!!!! But supposing I was on an Africa safari , trip of a lifetime, and got exposed to this. Knowing my chance of survival there was almost zero and my chance of survival here was much , much better. I would love to be full of honor and integrity and say no way would I lie on that form. But really with a literal and figurative gun to my head, would I lie ? I cannot answer that. I think many of us can say we would do x, y or z in a certain set of circumstances. But until we are in that situation, how can you be so sure. What if it was my child who were exposed and not me? Would I lie to protect my kid? Would I risk others dying to save my own child?
So , yeah, I'm very upset about the lie and even MORE so by the chain of events once he arrived to Dallas and became ill. It's a bad scene from every angle.
:waiting:
He lied to the hospital too. The first lie at the airport is somewhat understandable, the second one, to me, is evil.