http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/11/3/pdfs/04-0981.pdf
I own two of the most adorable, affectionate and smart dogs in the world. It would KILL me to see them suffer, or be put down.
That being said, if there was proof that this disease is zoonotic, between canines and humans, I could not live with myself (and probably wouldn't have to!) if I knew my dogs could take out the city, state, etc.
God, please don't let this be!!!
From WHO, "The virus [ebola] is transmitted to people from wild animals and spreads in the human population through human-to-human transmission."
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/
From web md, here are 39 diseases you can get directly from animals. Rabies was the first one that popped in my head.
http://www.webmd.com/healthy-aging/features/diseases-from-animals-primer
MOD NOTE: Lay off those who already have suffered, and instead focus on the DISEASE itself, and the measures taken to contain it and control its spread, plus the obstacles.
I doubt the deputy has ebola, but I am very glad to see a proper response.
Being Frisco, it doesn't surprise me, and I believe we would all be safe if we could depend on all counties and countries to be as diligent as Frisco is .
I'm sorry, but I don't think walking into a crowded clinic was an appropriate response. If he was sick, since he was exposed, he should have called the CDC.
So why are you so concerned about the dog thing?
Are you worried that DOGS might introduce the virus into your state or into your home? Are you worried about dogs from West Africa arriving on international flights to Louisiana and infecting the local populace?
This isn't about dogs, if you want to kill or get rid of your dog you don't need to use Ebola as an excuse.
There is NO clinical link to canine infection or transmission whatsoever, but if you want to kill your dog you don't need to find a reason, and using Ebola as a reason is stretching things to an extreme.
From WILD animals, not domestic pets, right?
Quote Originally Posted by DeeDeah View Post
Is it insensitive of me to say I'm more worried about the harmless and blameless dog than the woman?
Almost NO diseases are transmittable cross species. "putting the dog down" is a knee jerk reaction, imo.
Quote Originally Posted by DeeDeah View Post
I despise ignorance. This was so unnecessary and thoughtless. I'm new here so I'm just finding my way around. Not sure how to quote every post, BUT someone posted earlier that some dogs contracted Ebola from eating flesh from corpses.
Obviously, this poor dog didn't eat any flesh of a corpse since this woman is still alive. I also am skeptical about these claims.
Almost ZERO human diseases can be transmitted to animals, just like almost ZERO animal diseases can be transmitted to humans.
Forgive me for what may seem like an over-reaction to this news. I am an animal lover who fosters dogs and cats until they can find forever homes, and I've been exposed to a lot of diseases that dogs and cats carry. The worst I've ever gotten from an infected animal was ringworm.
Although unpleasant and uncomfortable, it's treatable with topical meds. I don't mean to diminish the Ebola virus in humans, but killing the dog seems like a knee jerk reaction.
From WHO, "The virus [ebola] is transmitted to people from wild animals and spreads in the human population through human-to-human transmission."
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/
From web md, here are 39 diseases you can get directly from animals. Rabies was the first one that popped in my head.
http://www.webmd.com/healthy-aging/features/diseases-from-animals-primer
Okay I read most of the study. It says NOTHING about canines being the host for this disease or spreading it. It talks a lot about France, which to my knowledge has had NO Ebola cases, so why is France being cited as the baseline for the statistics?????
Do the people living in France hunt and eat bush meat? Are they likely to hunt and kill Ebola infected Gorillas or other primates/monkeys? Do they eat the bats that are known to carry Ebola????
If the answer is NO (and it is, unless they are getting bush meat via black market from Africa) then well the whole study is ridiculous. Meaningless. Just plain silly.
Thus, dogs appear to be the first animal species shown to be naturally and asymptomatically infected by Ebola virus. Asymptomatic Ebola infection in humans has also been observed during outbreaks (18) but is very rare. Although dogs can be asymptomatically infected, they may excrete infectious viral particles in urine, feces, and saliva for a short period before virus clearance, as observed experi- mentally in other animals. Given the frequency of contact between humans and domestic dogs, canine Ebola infec- tion must be considered as a potential risk factor for human infection and virus spread
Human infection could occur through licking, biting, or grooming. Asymptomatically infected dogs could be a potential source of human Ebola outbreaks and of virus spread during human outbreaks, which could explain some epidemiologically unrelated human cases. Dogs might also be a source of human Ebola outbreaks, such as the 1976 Yambuku outbreaks in Democratic Republic of Congo (19), the 1995 Kikwit out- break, some outbreaks that occurred in 1996 and 2004 in Gabon and Republic of Congo (5), and the 1976 (6), 1979 (20), and 2004 (21) outbreaks in Sudan, the sources of which are still unknown. Together, these findings strongly suggest that dogs should be taken into consideration dur- ing the management of human Ebola outbreaks
Why did they not give the deputies at the very least gloves and face masks?
They already knew Duncan had Ebola by the time they send deputies in.
Because of the assurances from the CDC and WHO that the virus could absolutely NOT be spread through indirect contact.
MOD NOTE: Lay off those who already have suffered, and instead focus on the DISEASE itself, and the measures taken to contain it and to control its spread, plus the obstacles.