LinasK
Verified insider- Mark Dribin case
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 26,999
- Reaction score
- 25,530
<modsnip>
I'm not Sonya610 but I think I know where she's coming from...maybe not but here's my take on her post that I can honestly relate to...
HIV back in the 80's was reported on as mostly something that homosexuals passed to one another, as well as intravenous drug users - the world media pushed this theory on us that weren't gay or drug addicts that we were sort of safe so to speak, not really much to worry about just don't have sex with somebody that "could" be infected. As it turned out they were all wrong. Bad blood supplies, many individuals having unprotected sex, drugs, cleaning an infected person, etc. So some of us, myself included, didn't take it as serious as we should have.
H1N1 - Never took this serious at all bc media reported it as being related to birds and I don't go near birds at all, not even if one flies into my car window, grill or tire. However, in some areas of the US (as well as the world) H1N1 was a problem. Media hyped it in certain areas and downplayed it in others.
SARS - I never once took this seriously as I thought it was contained to Asia. Again, media reporting.
Ebola - Well, this I do take serious completely bc it's one of the most infectious diseases out there with no known cure and a high fatality rate. However, the difference here is that I learned about Ebola years ago when in college. HIV, SARS, H1N1 were diseases/viruses that only made the news when they were first discovered. Actually, HIV was discovered many many MANY years ago but was only given some kind of name in the 80's when the CDC & WHO put a label on it. Ebola some of us may take as something more serious bc we know more about it, even if we're only a tiny bit educated on it.
I agree with Sonya and think people should take this very seriously. I also would like to add that the media better get their $h!+ together and start reporting logically. They need to knock it off misleading people into thinking they're safe if they're in the same room with someone that has Ebola. If a person is within 5-6 feet of a person infected with Ebola and they're skin isn't protected, and the Ebola infected person sneezes - well... Sweat, blood, etc. Public restrooms are out of the question for me unless I have a pack of Clorox wipes with me, restrooms freak me out anyway. Ebola can survive on clothes, bed linens, etc. Ebola can absolutely survive on railings for a very short period but never the less can survive.
Excellent post!!!:clap::clap::clap::goodpost: