SCHMAE
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2011
- Messages
- 13,142
- Reaction score
- 2,915
I admit that I had assumed a lot about the "monitoring" criteria. I assumed also that "any" fever along with "having had just been involved with treating an Ebola patient" would have put a person directly into quarrantine and not on an airplane full of unsuspecting people. What exactly did "monitoring" really mean? Trusting the exposed personnel to do whatever they please? go where ever they want? I had incorrectly assumed that these people being monitored would not be allowed to travel on public transportation of any kind until the possibility of Ebola infection had been ruled out. I guess that's what I get for assuming.
I 'm with you . I thought monitoring meant something else. Apparently it means ' call us if you vomit or run fever' and otherwise , live your normal life.