Evidence connecting JR, CWW and/or MS to one another. How/when do their paths cross?

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Eileen730 said:
I think I'm missing it !
Where should I be looking?

KW has known him for 20 yrs but MS was engaged to her sister 24 yrs ago?
Click to expand...

Unfortunately we cannot sleuth the aunt or the little sister mentioned in the article,

-Nin
 
No it's not said:
Unfortunately we cannot sleuth the aunt or the little sister mentioned in the article,

-Nin
Click to expand...

No I know that I was talking about the statement that she knew him 20 yrs and her sister dated him 24 yrs ago.

No matter I think JR is one of these guys sons!
 
Sievers listed Wright as his brother on Facebook. Wright and Rodgers also were connected through Facebook.


didn't JR call CWW his brother?
 
No it's not said:
You have to read every single word KW is saying in this article. It could be a smoking gun.

http://www.news-press.com/story/new...ght-mother-law-sievers-link-deep-mo/72633014/

-Nin
Click to expand...

If a marriage is annulled ( as the mother mentioned in article ) , the state can *force* her to testify?

If she is still married, then she has the choice whether or not to testify,right ?

ETA ..if she was considered married at the time (as divorce doesn't release marital secrecy )

ETA #2- perhaps others know this but this might be a good question for the legal thread? It may not be relevant to this case but legally it's a question I have never considered.
 
atthelake said:
If a marriage is annulled ( as the mother mentioned in article ) , the state can *force* her to testify?

If she is still married, then she has the choice whether or not to testify,right ?

ETA ..if she was considered married at the time (as divorce doesn't release marital secrecy )

ETA #2- perhaps others know this but this might be a good question for the legal thread? It may not be relevant to this case but legally it's a question I have never considered.
Click to expand...

Without poring through Missouri case law (shudder), my guess would be that the marital privilege would apply to communications during the marriage even if there is an "annulment." And I bet that the husband (CWW) could assert the privilege and prevent her from testifying even if the wife (AW) wants to waive it.
 
atthelake said:
If a marriage is annulled ( as the mother mentioned in article ) , the state can *force* her to testify?

If she is still married, then she has the choice whether or not to testify,right ?

ETA ..if she was considered married at the time (as divorce doesn't release marital secrecy )

ETA #2- perhaps others know this but this might be a good question for the legal thread? It may not be relevant to this case but legally it's a question I have never considered.
Click to expand...

JMO, I don't think AW will obtain an annulment, unless there are facts we don't know and obviously that is possible.

Grounds for annulment include:

Minority (one party underage at the time of the marriage, no parental consent)
Marriage between related persons (incest)
Lack of capacity at the time of the marriage (mental illness, insanity)
Duress (one party was threatened)
Bigamy (one party was already legally married)
Fraud (impotency, failure to disclose a sexually transmitted disease, marriage induced by fraud)

So, maybe duress or fraud would apply.
 
I have found many past addresses for CWW and one was bought in 2013 cash and a relative of CWW still owns it. ON the relatives facebook , MS is her friend.
 
Lilibet said:
I need to start making a chart of relationships. It appears that MS was engaged about 24 years ago to the aunt of CWW's current wife, according to his mother-in-law, Karen Wideman (older sister of Shelly).



CWW and current wife Angela dated more than 24 years ago, as we knew before.



http://www.news-press.com/story/new...ght-mother-law-sievers-link-deep-mo/72633014/
Click to expand...

That link won't work for me :frown:
I get this message
We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe today :gaah:

Is anybody else not able to read it, or is it just me or my computer?
I ask because I have trouble all morning with WS, but only in the Sievers's threads. I tried posting earlier to AZlawyer, and when I was finished and hit reply, the page kept closing on me. Saying something about Internet explorer is not responding, and asked if I wanted to close and try to recover, but that even didn't help. All I got was the little red circle going round and round.
I lost my damn post 3 different times. I was using the "go advanced" if that makes any difference? :dunno:
 
Dmacky said:
That link won't work for me :frown:
I get this message
We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe today :gaah:

Is anybody else not able to read it, or is it just me or my computer?
I ask because I have trouble all morning with WS, but only in the Sievers's threads. I tried posting earlier to AZlawyer, and when I was finished and hit reply, the page kept closing on me. Saying something about Internet explorer is not responding, and asked if I wanted to close and try to recover, but that even didn't help. All I got was the little red circle going round and round.
I lost my damn post 3 different times. I was using the "go advanced" if that makes any difference? :dunno:
Click to expand...

I get the same thing unless I hit view in PRIVATE BROWSING MODE on my MAC.
 
Dmacky said:
That link won't work for me :frown:
I get this message
We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe today :gaah:

Is anybody else not able to read it, or is it just me or my computer?
I ask because I have trouble all morning with WS, but only in the Sievers's threads. I tried posting earlier to AZlawyer, and when I was finished and hit reply, the page kept closing on me. Saying something about Internet explorer is not responding, and asked if I wanted to close and try to recover, but that even didn't help. All I got was the little red circle going round and round.
I lost my damn post 3 different times. I was using the "go advanced" if that makes any difference? :dunno:
Click to expand...

no - it's not just you - other people have been having trouble with it too

http://www.news-press.com/story/new...ght-mother-law-sievers-link-deep-mo/72633014/
Sievers suspect's wife stands by her man, relative says
MICHAEL BRAUN and BEN BRASCH, BBRASCH@NEWS-PRESS.COM 9:19 p.m. EDT September 22, 2015

The mother-in-law of Curtis Wayne Wright, a suspect in the Dr. Teresa Sievers homicide case, says her daughter is standing by her husband despite his being in a Missouri jail awaiting extradition to Florida.

Karen Wideman said Tuesday that her daughter Angela Wideman Wright, 42, dated Wright, 47, more than 24 years ago and reconnected with him about a year and a half ago at a church function. They were married in Missouri in May, with Teresa Sievers' husband, Mark, presiding as the best man. Teresa Sievers did not attend the nuptials.

"She said they're trying to railroad him," Wideman said of her daughter. "I just tell her that justice will prevail."

The Missouri woman said she thinks her daughter should open her eyes and get her marriage annulled, but Angela is standing by him. She said her daughter has been told by her husband's lawyer not to talk about the case.

<snip>
The entire family is in counseling after Wright's arrest, Wideman said. "I told her, 'You've got to get yourself together.'"

She said the area of Missouri that they are in is like a little commune.

"It's tiny," she said. "Everybody knows everybody. Somehow, it will come out. We're just trying to keep our acts together."
 
I can imagine AW is madder than a wet hen at her mother for talking to the press. It would be interesting to hear from the aunt
 
Dmacky said:
That link won't work for me :frown:
I get this message
We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe today :gaah:

Is anybody else not able to read it, or is it just me or my computer?
I ask because I have trouble all morning with WS, but only in the Sievers's threads. I tried posting earlier to AZlawyer, and when I was finished and hit reply, the page kept closing on me. Saying something about Internet explorer is not responding, and asked if I wanted to close and try to recover, but that even didn't help. All I got was the little red circle going round and round.
I lost my damn post 3 different times. I was using the "go advanced" if that makes any difference? :dunno:
Click to expand...

These articles still are available freely to anyone that does private browsing or regularly clears their cookies and history, which every good sleuth should. These articles still must comply with the 10% copyright rule.
 
M.S. and CWW are brothers from different mothers and JR. Is one of their sons!
LOL

How about that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 255 more.
Total: 562 (members: 256, guests: 306)

Online statistics

Members online
256
Guests online
306
Total visitors
562
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,676
Messages
18,243,905
Members
234,421
Latest member
EimearRyan90
Back
Top