Sorry, but you're not getting by that easy. LOL. This is still not proof he took it off "for the MO wedding", which is the place where all this "finger pointing" (pun intended) and innuendo started. I'm just "pointing" out evidence to my fellow members here. Don't we all want evidence? Hasn't everyone been salivating for facts? Are we in search of truth?
:tantrum:
Well this physical evidence indicates that MS went without his ring a LOT. Every sleuth in this forum is smart enough to understand this does not mean he never took it off for one second during the entire marriage. One can try to circumvent or distract this fact by showing all the pictures of him wearing that ring they wish.
:shame:
However, this is solid evidence he went without "said ring"often. Often enough for TS to know about it.
:facepalm:
Without the tell-tale TAN LINES and DEEP INDENTATIONS on his finger, there is zero physical evidence that he was “hiding” the ring from anyone at CWW's wedding. In fact it contradicts it altogether. One would have to go without a ring for a LONG time to cover uneven skin tone and impression marks on their fingers. Much longer than a weekend wedding.
:thinking:
But this little fact, is not "fitting", into everybody's little theory worlds. Just because some personally think it is automatically evil to go ringless, does not make it so. And ignoring the clear evidence that this man didn’t wear his ring often is cut-rate sleuthing. You guys can do better! We want truth here right?
illowfight2:
Luv ya even if you disagree
:tantrum:
Well this physical evidence indicates that MS went without his ring a LOT. Every sleuth in this forum is smart enough to understand this does not mean he never took it off for one second during the entire marriage. One can try to circumvent or distract this fact by showing all the pictures of him wearing that ring they wish.
:shame:
However, this is solid evidence he went without "said ring"often. Often enough for TS to know about it.
:facepalm:
Without the tell-tale TAN LINES and DEEP INDENTATIONS on his finger, there is zero physical evidence that he was “hiding” the ring from anyone at CWW's wedding. In fact it contradicts it altogether. One would have to go without a ring for a LONG time to cover uneven skin tone and impression marks on their fingers. Much longer than a weekend wedding.
:thinking:
But this little fact, is not "fitting", into everybody's little theory worlds. Just because some personally think it is automatically evil to go ringless, does not make it so. And ignoring the clear evidence that this man didn’t wear his ring often is cut-rate sleuthing. You guys can do better! We want truth here right?
illowfight2:
Luv ya even if you disagree