If it was a case of testing for fingerprints or preserving the adhesive then I think that obtaining the fingerprints (if any) were of priority. Not a Bombshell disclosure by any means. But let Baez blather about it for a while, it's all he has.
HELP! I think my post got lost in the detour this thread took earlier this afternoon. I really want to understand this so can someone give me a synopsis or confirmation of the following:
The heart sticker residue on the duct tape was destroyed. Could it/was it sacrificed for the purpose of fingerprint analysis? IOW, when forensic evidence is put thru testing, there is a knowledge that a certain amount will not be recoverable due to testing procedures. Was their a photo taken of it prior to the analysis/destruction of the residue? My initial thoughts are that if it was sacrificed for the analysis, it is a non issue. It's not a mistake or mishandling. Am I off base? What is the general consensus here?
I had been away for several days and trying to catch up.....Thanks!
Not to mention she was only a seasonal photo booth employee, not one with an office or any reason to step into an office unless it's HR or uniforms or something. That's what sticks in my craw, if she was trying so hard to lead them to Universal in order to get them to watch security tapes then, if she were leading them to a building she didn't have an office in anyways, why wouldn't she take them to the security building? To dismiss everything by saying "Well, she was afraid something bad would happen to her family"- okay, fine, let's say that was true. Well that's not an issue now. If those bad people who killed Caylee are still out there and the reason she can't talk is because of her family's safety- well, it's not like they have jobs or anything. Move, change names, start a new life, and let your daughter clear her name. Use the money from 48 Hours to hire bodyguards. It just does. not. wash.
I'm sorry, that's insanely off topic. I will try to pull it back by saying that I think the FBI knew what they were doing and did the test for prints knowing that the sticker would get destroyed. One more thing, maybe tangential- the heart sticker found on the scene was on a picture frame, have we seen any info on what photo (if any) was in the picture frame?
HELP! I think my post got lost in the detour this thread took earlier this afternoon. I really want to understand this so can someone give me a synopsis or confirmation of the following:
The heart sticker residue on the duct tape was destroyed. Could it/was it sacrificed for the purpose of fingerprint analysis? IOW, when forensic evidence is put thru testing, there is a knowledge that a certain amount will not be recoverable due to testing procedures. Was their a photo taken of it prior to the analysis/destruction of the residue? My initial thoughts are that if it was sacrificed for the analysis, it is a non issue. It's not a mistake or mishandling. Am I off base? What is the general consensus here?
I had been away for several days and trying to catch up.....Thanks!
Not to mention she was only a seasonal photo booth employee, not one with an office or any reason to step into an office unless it's HR or uniforms or something. That's what sticks in my craw, if she was trying so hard to lead them to Universal in order to get them to watch security tapes then, if she were leading them to a building she didn't have an office in anyways, why wouldn't she take them to the security building? To dismiss everything by saying "Well, she was afraid something bad would happen to her family"- okay, fine, let's say that was true. Well that's not an issue now. If those bad people who killed Caylee are still out there and the reason she can't talk is because of her family's safety- well, it's not like they have jobs or anything. Move, change names, start a new life, and let your daughter clear her name. Use the money from 48 Hours to hire bodyguards. It just does. not. wash.
I'm sorry, that's insanely off topic. I will try to pull it back by saying that I think the FBI knew what they were doing and did the test for prints knowing that the sticker would get destroyed. One more thing, maybe tangential- the heart sticker found on the scene was on a picture frame, have we seen any info on what photo (if any) was in the picture frame?
Fingerprints are left because of the oil in a person's skin. Oil and water don't mix, so it's possible that fingerprints could remain even after a lengthy submersion in water. If you try to remove an oily substance using only water, it's very difficult, if not impossible to do...........some sort of soap or degreaser is necessary.
totally agreeI
All the fbi had to do was take a picture of the evidence before it was destroyed.
.
Exactly! And why oh why did LE exclude everyone but Casey?
HELP! I think my post got lost in the detour this thread took earlier this afternoon. I really want to understand this so can someone give me a synopsis or confirmation of the following:
The heart sticker residue on the duct tape was destroyed. Could it/was it sacrificed for the purpose of fingerprint analysis? IOW, when forensic evidence is put thru testing, there is a knowledge that a certain amount will not be recoverable due to testing procedures. Was their a photo taken of it prior to the analysis/destruction of the residue? My initial thoughts are that if it was sacrificed for the analysis, it is a non issue. It's not a mistake or mishandling. Am I off base? What is the general consensus here?
I had been away for several days and trying to catch up.....Thanks!
The duct tape and heart shaped sticker threads are both closed. I'm going to attempt to bring the article regarding the sticker evidence here as I just learned how to do it - this will be a test.
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/21104174/detail.html
What affect will this have on the Prosecution?
I couldn't copy the para's I needed so here are the first three para's - the best I could do from the link above.
FBI REPORT
Laboratory No.: 081213001 Case ID No.: 7A-TP-711(I messed up - not whole number)
12/12/08 By: EPM - Per telcalls/emails w/CRT* agent Karen Cowan - some items to be brought to Lab on Sat. for testing. Lab agreed to expedite (over weekend) only the items for identification: plus the duct tape for LPOU*. The other items can be delivered, but will be dealt w/during normal working hours.
12/13/08 By: EPM - Copy of OCSO inventory list provided by SA Cowan. No DNAJ on tape vice under water (prev. spoke w/DNAI Pokomk). SA Cowan will send listing of items they have from scenes*.) so units can review & items can be submitted @ one time.
12/13/08 By: EPM - Per TEV* (Shaw). Q59.1 5 hair portions for mito added & 59.2 15 hair roots for DNAI added. TEV transferred on their chgn*. Per LPOU (Fontane) - a heart shape/outline was noticed on tape, but unable to see it after powder process - no photo of EPM image.
There are two more entries - the first one begins with the A's having done landscaping recently, etc.
*If you see *, that means I could not make out a letter but you can look at the link above.
Why is the heart shaped sticker important? In my opinion it is important because the media has been force feeding this tidbit to us for several months i.e. NG a heart shaped sticker placed directly over the mouth
From what I have gathered in this thread, although several people have looked at the duct tape only one tech believed they saw residue in the shape of a heart, and now due to further testing this cannot be proven nor disproven.
Unfortunately for Casey, the media has been stating this as a damning fact for quite some time. If you hear something enough eventually you may start to believe it.
I just think that this and many of the other statements made by the media that are stated unfairly as fact, could hurt Casey's right to a fair trial just my opinion
HELP! I think my post got lost in the detour this thread took earlier this afternoon. I really want to understand this so can someone give me a synopsis or confirmation of the following:
The heart sticker residue on the duct tape was destroyed. Could it/was it sacrificed for the purpose of fingerprint analysis? IOW, when forensic evidence is put thru testing, there is a knowledge that a certain amount will not be recoverable due to testing procedures. Was their a photo taken of it prior to the analysis/destruction of the residue? My initial thoughts are that if it was sacrificed for the analysis, it is a non issue. It's not a mistake or mishandling. Am I off base? What is the general consensus here?
I had been away for several days and trying to catch up.....Thanks!