jillycat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 2,746
- Reaction score
- 11,841
It does seem that the State found a "glove that fits". Sort of.
Until, new evidence is discovered, someone slips up, or a body is found, the State will be sticking to their story (that could be easily interpreted by a jury IMO).
Being this is a circumstantial case (at his point) – with no body or direct evidence, the State's scenario is only supported by some shoddy video, a few cell phone pings, a motive, and whatever was found at the M's compound which led to an arrest in the first place.
The strategy
Horry County Solicitor Jimmy Richardson said when the case got to his office, it was a matter of strategy to get the Moorers in custody on the lesser charges of indecent exposure and obstruction of justice before investigators brought in the U.S. Attorney’s General Office, the S.C. Highway Patrol’s Multidisciplinary Accident Investigation Team and the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division to build a case on the bigger charges.
“The stuff that was found at the house, if we didn’t have a lot of stuff already from two months ago or six weeks ago, it wouldn’t have been that much,” Richardson said. “But it has added to things we already expected. So we were able to find some extra stuff after what we already knew to be obstruction of justice and indecent exposure.
Why not just come out and say what basic information LE has to feel so strongly that HE drove to PTL and was killed there? Instead, they opted for a gag order. And further, the M's were granted bail with no contest.
Looking back at the search of PTL, why didn't LE collect more evidence (if any) where HE's car was parked? They seemed to focus all their efforts on searching the water IMO. I went there during and after the search and was alarmed to find a ton of debris in and around the location where her car was found. Not to mention several fresh tire tracks that could have been used as possible evidence. It appeared to me at least that the parking lot area was completely ignored. :facepalm: So, I guess add that to my "dumbfounded" list as well!
I agree and like your Bob Ross analogy @jillycat! :clap:
Sorry so sporadic. My coffee hasn't kicked in yet.
I've always thought the defense will have a field day with the "strategy" of getting them on lesser charges in hopes of finding more "stuff", which the Solicitor himself said amounts to not much. My feeling is that the defense has something up its sleeve to put up with this kind of direction for this long.