Honestly, it wasn't until I started keeping up with this case that I realized examiners could tell the difference in what caused prior injuries, such as digital, so I'm not so sure an adult in the 90's would have known. Or maybe the perp had an idea, but still thought it was worth a try and better than nothing. And maybe the reason the staging causes me such fits is because there were 2 different stagers...the 1st one and then a 2nd one who undid some and then did more. I didn't realize the FBI thought there were 2 killers or I forgot. hmmm, that's interesting. The whole scene IMO, comes across as a sober man cleaning up after a night of drinking. You know? like he got drunk, made a mess and broke things and then had to tidy up the next day and apologize to all the people he called the night before and cussed out. mooIve wondered these same questions. Some things are unclear. The bifringent material might have arrived on a gloved finger, and something else may have caused her vaginal injuries that night. But assuming a paintbrush injury, I agree this makes no sense as a mock pedo scene to thereafter clean and redress her.
The FBI said there was likely 2 killers, one organized and one disorganized. So in that line of thinking there could have been 2 stagers at this point and it is one idea for resolving a conflicted scene. However, Im thinking this part with the paintbrush may have been PRs. Disorganized example: Some things just do not track, A,B, C, D etc. They might do A and then decide to tackle D and then go back to B. Oh, yeah, JR cant stand the sight of blood so Id better clean her up.
Meyer said the likely instrument (the paintbrush) wasnt gently inserted, but jabbed into her. I agree it seems so improbable that anyone would think that this would hide prior abuse (staging) Another scenario to the idea of hiding prior abuse is based on a mother blaming the victim, and this might point to PR who may have had a violent reaction to her daughters involvement in sex with a member of the family (moo, this went beyond a playing doctor scenario). So the paintbrush may have been an assault on JB with dual motivations disguise prior abuse plus real anger at the victim.
All this MOO.
Re: 2 killers, one organized and one disorganized
I would think that the 2 would actually work together to stage. Wouldn't they talk to each other and get on the same page in regards on what they were doing? :dunno:
Honestly, it wasn't until I started keeping up with this case that I realized examiners could tell the difference in what caused prior injuries, such as digital, so I'm not so sure an adult in the 90's would have known. Or maybe the perp had an idea, but still thought it was worth a try and better than nothing. And maybe the reason the staging causes me such fits is because there were 2 different stagers...the 1st one and then a 2nd one who undid some and then did more. I didn't realize the FBI thought there were 2 killers or I forgot. hmmm, that's interesting. The whole scene IMO, comes across as a sober man cleaning up after a night of drinking. You know? like he got drunk, made a mess and broke things and then had to tidy up the next day and apologize to all the people he called the night before and cussed out. moo
also,the stick would have caused different scars,more damage ,more blood?
Re: 2 killers, one organized and one disorganized
I would think that the 2 would actually work together to stage. Wouldn't they talk to each other and get on the same page in regards on what they were doing? :dunno:
Sorry, quest, but I have to call you on the two bolded.Ive wondered these same questions. Some things are unclear. The bifringent material might have arrived on a gloved finger, and something else may have caused her vaginal injuries that night. But assuming a paintbrush injury, I agree this makes no sense as a mock pedo scene to thereafter clean and redress her.
The FBI said there was likely 2 killers, one organized and one disorganized. So in that line of thinking there could have been 2 stagers at this point and it is one idea for resolving a conflicted scene. However, Im thinking this part with the paintbrush may have been PRs. Disorganized example: Some things just do not track, A,B, C, D etc. They might do A and then decide to tackle D and then go back to B. Oh, yeah, JR cant stand the sight of blood so Id better clean her up.
Meyer said the likely instrument (the paintbrush) wasnt gently inserted, but jabbed into her. I agree it seems so improbable that anyone would think that this would hide prior abuse (staging) Another scenario to the idea of hiding prior abuse is based on a mother blaming the victim, and this might point to PR who may have had a violent reaction to her daughters involvement in sex with a member of the family (moo, this went beyond a playing doctor scenario). So the paintbrush may have been an assault on JB with dual motivations disguise prior abuse plus real anger at the victim.
All this MOO.
where the red arrow is on this picture ...can anyone tell me what that image(black blob) is or what they think it is? and is this (black blob) inside of the home or outside of the home?
any feedback or thoughts would be appreciated...thanks
[/URL][/IMG]
where image came from: http://www.acandyrose.com/AnatomyColdCase054.jpg
Sorry, quest, but I have to call you on the two bolded.
I don't think the FBI actually said there were likely two killers. If I'm not mistaken, seems like a former FBI profiler (either McCrary, or maybe Ressler) stated in an interview that the crime scene showed signs of both organized and disorganized personalities. But IIRC, he also stated that much of what was present in the crime scene was most likely staging. Seems like he was trying to say (without actually stating it) that he thought both adult Ramseys were complicit at least in the staging.
Also, Dr. Meyer never (TMK) never spoke about the autopsy results to anyone outside of the investigation, so all we know is what is written in the AR and what others have stated (as in the search warrants) about his comments. From those sources, he never stated that the paintbrush was actually what was used. Nor did he ever state that it was a finger that was inserted. He also never stated anything about the gentle vs. violent nature of the violation -- and he absolutely never used the word "jabbed" in describing how anything was used. Instead, all we know is what he stated in the AR, and reports in the search warrants of his having stated during the autopsy that the vaginal injuries were "consistent with digital penetration". And even that does not mean that a finger was actually used. He's simply trying in that observation to note that the penetration was not what would be expected to be found under circumstances of a typical rape.
I know some here have inferred that because the two phrases ("sexual assault" and "digital penetration") have been used, there were two separate type of assaults. And then the inference is carried to another level and stated as being a digital assault and a separate assault with the paintbrush. But that is not what was stated. It doesn't mean it couldn't have actually happened of course -- but the coroner never stated that.
Yes, I agree. Perhaps after he couldn't get her up after whacking her with the golf club again, or the flashlight, or the bat. He tried. He even jabbed her with the train track trying to wake her up.
Then he woke up ....Patsy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
where the red arrow is on this picture ...can anyone tell me what that image(black blob) is or what they think it is? and is this (black blob) inside of the home or outside of the home?
any feedback or thoughts would be appreciated...thanks
[/URL][/IMG]
where image came from: http://www.acandyrose.com/AnatomyColdCase054.jpg
At first I considered perhaps it was a person, but IMO it's an illusion as the proportions are all wrong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
thank you for your feedback....here is that same object...from the same picture that I linked from above...but just made that portion larger...
[/URL][/IMG]