WholeLottaRosie
Dancing on a moonbeam!
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 2,403
- Reaction score
- 75
Right on! A dog cannot trace a car's footsteps. It just isn't possible. They can tell you if a body was in a car or not, but not where the car went.
If the wind was too strong, the dogs would have a hard time searching. Anyone know what type of dogs were used? German Shepherds? They aren't so good for water searches, and I believe when the dogs went it was flooded, was it not? They can still be used for those searches, but their abilities are more for strength and agility / long distances. Up here we train those dogs to be able to go 40km a day, then again the next day. I don't know what the standards are in the US.
If the wind wasn't co-operating during the search, then the dogs would also have a hard time. In that situation, a heavy wooded forest, they would airscent like the diagram I posted on the previous page. The dogs should have still been able to search the area, but it depends how far away from that exact location they were. They should be usually fine to find the location of a body no matter how many days have passed, burried or not. But since reports are saying the area was used as a graveyard of sorts in the past, then there could have been other scents that threw the dogs off.
I'd guess that they weren't close enoguh for the dogs to catch onto the scent of Caylee.
How many dogs were used? Does anyone know?
What I wonder is about the pesticides. They took stuff from the Anthony home. It was suggested somewhere that pesticide(s) was/were used to keep insects down, so I am wondering if the bag was sprayed with pesticides, would this have interfered with the dogs being able to find it.