Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jeb Bush made a statement that he TM was fleeing and shot in the back
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com..._jeb-bush-ground-neighborhood-watch-volunteer
Does anyone want to go in the chatroom and discuss?
When Trayvon asks "Why are you following me?" zimmerman has a perfectly natural and logical opportunity to identify himself and why he is there. Indeed, Trayvon has just asked him for that information. George chooses to ignore the question, chooses NOT to identify himself. I am pretty comfortable armchair quarterbacking that decision. I find it extremely foolish at best and incriminating at worst. Moo
where is the chat room?
I didn't get that at all from the article? I understood him to say that the law does not apply to Zimmerman because Trayvon had tried to get away from him and Zimmerman followed.
I really think all the evidence points to Zimmerman shooting Martin in the back while he had him pinned down. 2 witnesses said they heard the shot and looked out and he was knelt down on him.
I thought he meant Trayvon was shot in the back while attempting to get away from Zimmerman sorry
When Trayvon asks "Why are you following me?" zimmerman has a perfectly natural and logical opportunity to identify himself and why he is there. Indeed, Trayvon has just asked him for that information. George chooses to ignore the question, chooses NOT to identify himself. I am pretty comfortable armchair quarterbacking that decision. I find it extremely foolish at best and incriminating at worst. Moo
Well I don't have a crystal ball to gaze in for all the answers. So, I'll stick with what we know which isn't much, as facts are very limited concerning this incident... We don't know that Zimmerman didn't identify himself and to claim he didn't without supporting evidence is speculation.
Very suspicious that the autopsy hasn't been released. Parents may have been told where Travon was shot, but were they told what the point of entry was, anterior or posterior?
Well I don't have a crystal ball to gaze in for all the answers. So, I'll stick with what we know which isn't much, as facts are very limited concerning this incident... We don't know that Zimmerman didn't identify himself and to claim he didn't without supporting evidence is speculation.
I totally agree.People say Trayvon could have answered Zimmerman's question, but it goes both ways. In fact, I think Zimmerman had more of an obligation to answer, considering the fact that he was the one following another person.
This is one of the most disgusting things the police and city did. Does anyone believe that a cop would go to a grieving family to talk about the case and say " Mr. Zimmerman says he has a squeaky clean record"? That makes no sense and there would be no reason to say that without saying but we know better, he has violent arrest in the past.
Then to put the "misunderstanding" on the shoulders of the grieving parent. Of course it could never be the cop said it the way the parent says because cops never lie.It was simply an attempt of the cops to make Zimmerman look good and the City backing it up.
http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigation/docs/Zimmerman_Martin_shooting.pdf
Why was George Zimmerman labeled as squeaky clean when in fact he has
a prior arrest history?
In one of the initial meetings with the father of the victim the investigator related to
him the account that Mr. Zimmerman provided of the incident. At that time the
investigator said that Mr. Zimmerman portrayed himself to be squeaky clean. We
are aware of the background information regarding both individuals involved in this
event. We believe Mr. Martin may have misconstrued this information.
Are you implying that it's unreasonable to believe that a parent going through an extremely emotional event might misconstrue what is said? JMOThis is one of the most disgusting things the police and city did. Does anyone believe that a cop would go to a grieving family to talk about the case and say " Mr. Zimmerman says he has a squeaky clean record"? That makes no sense and there would be no reason to say that without saying but we know better, he has violent arrest in the past.
Then to put the "misunderstanding" on the shoulders of the grieving parent. Of course it could never be the cop said it the way the parent says because cops never lie.
It was simply an attempt of the cops to make Zimmerman look good and the City backing it up.
http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigation/docs/Zimmerman_Martin_shooting.pdf
Why was George Zimmerman labeled as squeaky clean when in fact he has
a prior arrest history?
In one of the initial meetings with the father of the victim the investigator related to
him the account that Mr. Zimmerman provided of the incident. At that time the
investigator said that Mr. Zimmerman portrayed himself to be squeaky clean. We
are aware of the background information regarding both individuals involved in this
event. We believe Mr. Martin may have misconstrued this information.