bowler
Well-Known Member
well I will just have to try to get thru the interview with mr. eyebrows I suppose
If the family is avoiding the media then why go on GR?????:bang:
o dear "$$$ maybe"
well I will just have to try to get thru the interview with mr. eyebrows I suppose
If the family is avoiding the media then why go on GR?????:bang:
Read this from another site..........about SO Reynolds.........
*Reynolds reportedly borrowed a car from a friend and then later called to say the vehicle had broken down near the Marion/Lake County Lines, according to the Marion County Sheriffs Office. The car was located in an undisclosed location south of Marion County, but Reynolds was nowhere to be found.*
Okay thank you Momtective.
I think I figured it out. The W. Parsons we have been looking at, is listed along with a Wanda G. (same surname) in Tallahasee FL.
G stands for Gibson if we go by the intelius listing.
Since it indicates that it's a children's line they must have had a phone at one time for the children.
I see a few other names too. I'm looking them up on the internet but no luck as of yet. Trying to find W. Parsons through a back door.
Why is GA going to be on? I bet he won't be WITH the mom and gma - but separate interviews. Wasn't he turned away with KFN?
Oh wait, GA initially met with the DAD's side - um could he have switched sides now? I don't get it.
As for starting over and taking a new, fresh look at dad. I already have - and I can't rule him out. The 911 call is "too angry" - he's "too definitive" that someone "took her". He's very angry but I don't think that anger is anchored in Haleigh missing - more like he's angry because he came home early and gf wasn't there but Haleigh was up and tried to, in her own innocent way, defend gf by saying "but daddy, I'm a big girl, I can watch out for jr. Misty isn't gone long usually/" Which would have "set daddy off" and an "accident" happened. He's mad because gf caused him to do something he shouldn't have. Sound familiar?
I just found these from Putnam Civil Records
UCN: 542008DR001451FDXXXX
File Date: 2008-10-13 Disposition Date:
File Type: DOM - FD05
Judge: A W NICHOLS III
Plaintiffs
GRIFFIS BILLYE L Defendants
GRIFFIS JEFFFREY M
Date Docket Description
2008-10-13 001.PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
File Date: 2008-12-30 Disposition Date: 2009-01-14
File Type: INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION - FD10
Judge: ELIZABETH A MORRIS
Plaintiffs
GRIFFIS BILLYE Defendants
GRIFFIS JEFFREY
Then 01-05-09
UCN: 542009DR000007FDXXXX
File Date: 2009-01-05 Disposition Date: 2009-01-05
File Type: INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION - FD10
Judge: ELIZABETH A MORRIS
Plaintiffs
GRIFFIS JEFFREY OBO
GRIFFIS DUNCAN
Defendants
SAPP DONALD
Date Docket Description
2009-01-05 001.PETITION FOR INJUNCTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
2009-01-05 002.IDENTIFICATION - DRIVER'S LICENSE
2009-01-05 003.ORDER DENYING INJUNCTION - EAM 200954665633
O.K. we can pick up a 5 year old and possibly move her without her making a noise or waking up. ok, sounds reasonable...
Can we pick up a 5 year old who is sleeping beside of a 17 year old, move the 5 year old without her making a sound or waking up and walk that 5 year old out of the house and into the night without waking up the 17 yr old?
Have we learned anything from LE that would allow us to go in a different direction than the father and Misty? Considering it an "abduction" only means she was taken from her home against her will.
Now...do we believe she was still alive when she left the trailer? Not sure I do anymore. I have a new "column" of information which is what they are not telling us from LE. The fact they are not releasing the trailer tells me they believe whatever happened to Haleigh happened there.
Have we learned anything from LE that would allow us to go in a different direction than the father and Misty? Considering it an "abduction" only means she was taken from her home against her will.
Now...do we believe she was still alive when she left the trailer? Not sure I do anymore. I have a new "column" of information which is what they are not telling us from LE. The fact they are not releasing the trailer tells me they believe whatever happened to Haleigh happened there.
So this DSapp SOB had an injunction (PO) against him for domestic violence as recently as a month ago? Good grief!
arrot:
Okay, this probably has no bearing on the case since I don't think like a SO because I can't FATHOM this behavior
BUT,
I would think that if someone was so brazen that they would snatch a child of Haleigh's age as she laid next to or even near two others, they would KNOW that they were all sound sleepers. I have two sons and one of them wakes up at the sound of a footstep and ALWAYS has and the other can sleep through a parade of locomotives.
Just seems like the perp has GOT to know these people.
There are links in the media thread that say LE do not think he is involved with Haleigh in any way.
Officials said several people have inquired about Chad Reynolds, a sexual predator who disappeared from Marion County. Ryan said although Reynolds has ties to Putnam County, investigators do not believe he is connected to Haleighs disappearance.
OMG That is too funny! You just snapped me out of the major funk I've been in all day.:blowkiss:
Just a thought- but the 4-year old brother should be able to confirm he and his sister went to bed at the same time- so the timeline is narrowed down from their bedtime to 3:30am at the very least-- so nothing IMHO could have happened when the father was there....
So this DSapp SOB had an injunction (PO) against him for domestic violence as recently as a month ago? Good grief!
arrot:
Jeffrey died what date???
His crime was committed in Putnam but his victim profile seems to be 12-13 year old boys.