shadow of my mind
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2008
- Messages
- 1,947
- Reaction score
- 10
I am convinced that whoever took and did something to Haleigh that it was someone she knew. I think she was alive and walked to the pond and to the end of those tracks hence the reason why her scent stopped at the end of them. I think whoever it was that had her made her walk there and the fact that she KNEW them explains why she would have willingly went with them and didn't make a noise. They could have easily lied to her to get her to go with them if it was someone she knew and I have though since the day this news broke Haleigh knew whoever it was that took her and that this person knew their way around that house. It also explains why they knew exactly what room to go to and why they got out of that place with no one in the house knowing.
The POI could have parked his/her vehicle near the train tracks(ONLY IF THIS IS POSSIBLE) then walked to the Cummings house getting the brick on the way there so that they could use it to get Haleigh out of their faster. They then go in through the front door making their way into the kitchen and turning the light on. After doing that they go to the backdoor, open it up and then prop the brick there. They then make their way to the bedroom to get Haleigh who wakes up and willingly goes with them since she knew whoever it was. They walk into the woods, go near the pond to try and make people think she fell in or her body was dumped there, and they then leave the pond making their way back to the vehicle at the train tracks. While walking back to the vehicle they could have been lying to Haleigh all along about where they were going and why they were there.
This could explain why her scent was no longer there, the trail of scent to the pond, and would explain the brick there at the home.
If your theory were to be correct than that would mean that this person had to
#1 Know that Misty was not at home.
#2 Misty was incapacitated and would not be able to intervene
#3 Misty was in on it and would not intervene
#4 If Misty did find them in the home she would not be alarmed which means that they would have a reasonable explanation for being there in the first place.
Taking each one of these points and extrapolating them outward with
#1 If Misty was not at home
Did she did not have a vehicle.
She was with someone and she walked to where they live
She went for a walk alone
Someone else in his or her vehicle picked her up
She did have a vehicle
She went somewhere. Where and could anybody have seen her
Anything else that would fit in this category?
#2 Misty was incapacitated and would not be able to intervene
She was ill
She was high on some type of drug
She was drunk
She was knocked out by force
She was drugged by force
She was a dead to the world type sleeper
Anything else that would fit in this category?
#3 Misty was in on it and would not intervene
She was tired of being a built in babysitter and handed the child over to somebody who wanted a child
She was paid to let someone take the child
She was blackmailed into letting someone take the child
Anything else that would fit in this category?
#4 If Misty did find them in the home she would not be alarmed which means that they would have a reasonable explanation for being there in the first place.
A family member
A close family friend
Anything else that would fit in this category?
Just as a exercise what if any of them would fit the few facts that we know or work withing the boundries of what we know?